process for oil recovery from a formation containing oil

专利摘要:
PROCESS FOR THE RECOVERY OF OIL FROM A FORMATION CONTAINING OIL, COMPOSITION FOR USE IN THE RECOVERY OF PETROLEUM FROM A FORMATION CONTAINING OIL AND SULPHONED DERIVATIVE OF ONE OR MORE INTERNAL OLEFINS A process for recovering oil from a formation containing oil comprises the introduction in said formation of an aqueous composition comprising at least one sulfonated derivative of one or more internal olefins, said internal olefins being characterized by having low amounts of trisubstitutions in the olefin bond, said sulfonated derivatives being obtained by sulphonation of a composition comprising internal olefins of the formula: R1R2C = CR3R4 where R1, R2, R3 and R4 are the same or different and are hydrogen or saturated straight or branched hydro-carbyl groups and the total number of carbon atoms of R1 , R2, R3 and R4 is 6 to 44, under the condition that at least approximately 96 mol percent R1 and R3 are saturated hydrocarbyl groups of c straight or branched and that at least approximately 96 mol percent of R2 and R4 are hydrogen. Additionally, compositions are provided for use in the recovery of oil from a formation containing oil. (...)
公开号:BR112012029589B1
申请号:R112012029589-6
申请日:2011-05-20
公开日:2021-01-19
发明作者:John C.Hutchison；Patrick Shane Wolfe
申请人:Stepan Company；
IPC主号:

专利说明:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This description refers to a process for advanced oil recovery and compositions useful therein. More particularly, this description refers to a process for advanced oil recovery that employs a sulfonated internal olefin surfactant and an advanced oil recovery composition comprising the sulfonated internal olefin surfactant. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The development and production of oil from formations containing oil can include up to three phases: primary, secondary and tertiary (or advanced) recovery. During primary recovery, the natural energy present in the formation (for example, water, gas) and / or gravity drives the oil into the production well. Since oil is produced from an oil-containing formation, the pressures and / or temperatures within the formation may decline. Artificial lifting techniques (such as pumps) can be used to bring the oil to the surface. Only approximately 10 percent of a reservoir's original on-site oil (OOIP) is typically produced during primary recovery. Secondary recovery techniques are employed to prolong the productive life of the field and generally include the injection of a displacement fluid such as water (water flood) to displace the oil and lead it to a production well. Secondary recovery techniques typically result in the recovery of an additional 20 to 40 percent OOIP from a reservoir. However, even if the water injection was uninterrupted indefinitely, typically more than half of the OOIP would remain unrecovered due to a number of factors including, but not limited to, low water-oil mixing efficiency, due to the high interfacial tension between the water and oil, capillary forces in the formation, the temperature of the formation, the salinity of the water in the formation, the composition of the oil in the formation, and low sweep of the water injected during the formation. Primary and secondary techniques, therefore, leave a significant amount of oil remaining in the reservoir.
With much of the easy-to-produce oil already recovered from oil fields, producers have employed tertiary, or advanced oil recovery (EOR), techniques that offer the potential to recover 30 to 60 percent, or more, of OOIP of a reservoir. Three main categories of EOR have been found to be commercially successful. EOR techniques of thermal recovery involve the introduction of heat, such as the injection of steam to decrease the viscosity of crude oil to improve its ability to flow through the reservoir. EOR gas injection techniques use gases, such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide, that expand in a reservoir to propel additional oil into a production well, or other gases that dissolve in the oil to reduce its viscosity and improve fluidity of oil. Chemical EOR techniques involve injecting chemicals, such as surfactants (surfactant flooding) to help reduce the interfacial tension that inhibits or prevents oil droplets from moving through a reservoir, and polymers to allow the oil present in the formation be more easily mobilized through training.
Chemical EOR techniques can be performed before, during or after the implementation of primary and / or secondary recovery techniques. Chemical EOR techniques can also be performed in conjunction with other EOR techniques that do not involve chemical injection. There are two main types of surfactant flooding techniques. Flooding by Polymer Surfactant (SP) involves the injection into a reservoir of a fluid containing water and / or brine and approximately 1% by weight of surfactant and approximately 0.1% by weight of polymer. Flooding by Alkaline Polymer Surfactant (ASP) involves the injection of water and / or brine containing alkali in addition to the surfactant and polymer. ASP systems typically contain the order of approximately 0.5-1% by weight% alkali, 0.1-1% by weight 0.1-1% surfactant and 0.1-1% by weight% polymer. Typically, an SP or ASP flood is followed by an injection of a displacement fluid, for example, a flood and / or polymer "push" fluid. The choice between SP or ASP depends on a number of factors, including the acidity value of the oil to be recovered, the concentration of divalent ions (Ca2 +, Mg2 +), the brine present in the reservoir, the project economy and the capacity to perform water softening or desalination. The surfactant component reduces the interfacial tension between water and oil, while the polymer acts as a viscosity modifier and helps to mobilize oil. divalent ions that sequester alkali in the formation salt and thus reduce the adsorption of the surfactant during displacement through the formation. Alkali also generates an anionic surfactant, sodium naphthenate soap, in situ during formation by reaction with naphthenic acids naturally present in crude oil. The use of relatively cheap alkali reduces the amount of surfactant required and therefore the overall cost of the system. Alkali can also help change the formation's wettability to a state more moistened by water to improve the rate of imbibition.
The introduction of surfactants in a reservoir, sometimes combined with changes in the concentration of electrolytes, with the purpose of displacing the sorbed oil by carrying out spontaneous water imbibition in the reservoir rock, is an EOR technique known as "change in wettability" . This technique does not necessarily require low interfacial stresses between oil and aqueous phases or the formation of a microemulsion phase. It also does not necessarily require good sweeping efficiency of the displacement fluid, and, as such, may be useful in carbonate reservoirs that can be fractured and are typically of low conformity. Surfactants used in SP and ASP floods have also been shown to be useful in altering wettability based on EOR techniques.
A surfactant EOR system, after injection into an oil-containing formation, takes the crude oil and brine from the formation, to form a multiphase micro-emulsion in situ, when complete, is immiscible with the reservoir crude and exhibits low voltage interface (IFT) with crude oil and brine. EOR processes of commercial surfactants are based on achieving ultra-low IFT (ie less than 10'2 mN / m) to mobilize disconnected crude oil droplets in the formation and create an oil bank where both oil and water flow as a continuous phase. IFT changes with variables such as salinity, surfactant composition, crude oil composition and formation temperature. For anionic surfactants, an ideal salinity exists when microemulsions are formed which solubilize equal volumes of oil and water, and which exhibit almost equal IFT with oil and brine. Ultra-low IFT generally exists only in a narrow range of salinity that overlaps the ideal salinity for a given microemulsion.
Internal Olefin Sulphonates (IOS) are anionic surfactants that have been evaluated as EOR surfactants. Sulfonates of internal olefins can be prepared by sulfonation of internal olefins with the aid of SO3 and inert gases and subsequent neutralization. Internal olefins can be subdivided into: "di-substituted": R-CH = CH-R; "tri-substituted": R2C = CH-R; and "tetra-substituted": R2C = CR2; where R is a straight or branched chain hydrocarbon radical.
Internal olefin sources can be obtained from a variety of processes, including olefin (eg, ethylene, propylene and butylene) oligomerization processes, metathesis alpha-olefin processes, Fischer-Tropsch processes, catalytic dehydrogenation of paraffinic hydrocarbons long-chain, thermal cracking of hydrocarbon waxes and dimerized vinyl olefin processes. A well-known ethylene oligomerization process is the Shell Higher Olefin Process (SHOP). This process combines oligomerization of ethylene to form alpha-olefins, isomerization of alpha-olefins to form internal olefins and metathesis of these internal olefins butenes or ethylene to form alpha-olefins of different chain lengths. A problem associated with SHOP mentioned in U.S. Patent 6,777,584 is the undesirable branching over alpha-olefins and internal olefins that are often the result of oligomerization / isomerization / metathesis processes. Commercially available internal olefins typically contain on the order of approximately six molar percent or more of tri-substituted internal olefins. In addition, these commercial products typically contain appreciable amounts of non-linear, branched alkyl products. These alpha-olefins and internal olefins have been reported to contain a branched alkyl group in the order of approximately six molar percent or more. In addition, significant amounts of non-reactive, terminally unsaturated vinylidenes of the structure R2C = CH2 (where R is defined as above) are also known to be present in these commercially available materials.
US Patents No. 4,532,053, 4,549,607, 4,555,351, 4,556,108, 4,597,879, 4,733,728 and 4,765,408, disclose micro slugs containing, among other things, an internal olefin sulfonate for use in recovery of oil. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Internal olefin sulfonates, containing minimal amounts of tri-substituted internal olefins, have been found to have unique performance advantages in EOR applications over internal olefin sulfonates containing appreciable amounts, that is, greater than approximately six molar percent, of tri-substituted internal olefins. More particularly, it has been found that the ideal salinities of microemulsions made from internal olefins, containing low amounts of tri-substituted internal olefins, are significantly lower than the ideal salinities of microemulsions made from internal olefins with the same length of carbon chain that contain appreciable amounts of tri-substituted internal olefins. Ideal lower salinities imply increased utility in formulations for use in the advanced recovery of, among other things, waxy crude oil.
Therefore, in a first aspect of the present description, a process is provided for recovering petroleum from an oil-containing formation which comprises introducing into the formation an aqueous composition comprising at least one sulfonated derivative of an internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins. wherein said internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins corresponds to formula (I):
where R1, R2, R3 and R4 are the same or different and are hydrogen or straight or branched chain, saturated hydrocarbyl groups and the total number of carbon atoms of R1, R2, R3 and R4 is from 6 to 44, with the it is noted that at least approximately 96 molar percent of R1 and R3 are saturated straight or branched chain hydrocarbyl groups, and at least approximately 96 molar percent of R2 and R4 are hydrogen in the internal olefins or a mixture of internal olefins. The internal olefins of the formula R1R2C = CR1 and R4 can be obtained by the metathesis of a raw material comprising alpha-olefin or mixture of alpha-olefins of the formula R5HC = CH2, where R5 is a chain C3-C22 hydrocarbyl group branched or linear. The metathesis reaction is highly selective for the formation of di-substituted internal olefins of the formula formula R1R2C = CR3R4 wherein at least approximately 96, preferably at least approximately 97, more preferably at least approximately 98, and most preferably at least approximately 99 per molar percent of one of R1 and R3 are saturated straight or branched chain hydrocarbyl groups of at least approximately 96, preferably at least approximately 97, more preferably at least approximately 98 and most preferably at least approximately 99 molar percent of R2 and R4 are hydrogen. In one embodiment of this first aspect of the description, the straight or branched chain saturated hydrocarbyl groups R1 and R3 have low amounts, i.e., on the order of less than approximately 6 mol% of alkyl branching. The metathesis reaction can be conducted in the presence of a metathesis catalyst. Suitable metathesis catalysts include, but are not limited to, Grubbs, Hoveyda-Grubbs and Schrock catalysts.
In a second aspect of the present description, a composition is provided for use in recovering oil from an oil-containing formation, the composition comprising: (i) water; (ii) at least one sulfonated derivative of an internal olefin or mixture of olefins, wherein said internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins corresponds to formula (I):
where R1, R2, R3 and R4 are the same or different and are hydrogen or saturated straight or branched chain hydrocarbyl groups, and the total number of carbon atoms in R1, R2, R3 and R4 is 6 to 44, with the notes that at least approximately 96 molar percent of R1 and R3 are saturated straight or branched chain hydrocarbyl groups of at least approximately 96 molar percent of R2 and R4 are hydrogen in the internal olefins or a mixture of internal olefins; and (iii) optionally one or more additional components.
In an embodiment of this second aspect of the description, additional components, including, but not limited to, co-surfactants, solvents, polymers, alkali metals, and various combinations thereof, may be employed.
In a third aspect of the present description, a process for recovering petroleum from an oil-containing formation is provided, which comprises introducing into the said formation an aqueous composition comprising at least one sulfonated derivative of an internal olefin or mixture of olefins in which said internal olefin or a mixture of internal olefins is obtained by metathesis of an alpha-olefin or mixture of alpha-olefins in the presence of a metathesis catalyst comprising a Group 8 transition metal complex.
In a fourth aspect of the present disclosure, a composition is provided for use in recovering oil from an oil-containing formation, the composition comprising: (i) water; (ii) at least one sulfonated derivative of an internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins, wherein said internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins is obtained by the metathesis of an alpha-olefin or mixture of alpha-olefins in the presence of a catalyst metathesis comprising a Group 8 transition metal complex; and (iii) optionally one or more additional components. In an embodiment of this fourth aspect of the description, additional components, including, but not limited to, co-surfactants, solvents, polymers, alkali metals, and various combinations thereof, may be employed.
According to a fifth aspect of the description, a sulfonated derivative of an internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins is provided, wherein said internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins corresponds to formula (I):
where R1, R2, R3 and R4 are the same or different and are hydrogen saturated hydrocarbyl groups of straight or branched chain, and the total number of carbon atoms of R1, R2, R3 and R4 is from 6 to 44, with the proviso that at least approximately 96 molar percent of R1 and R3 are saturated straight or branched chain hydrocarbyl groups of at least approximately 96 molar percent of R2 and R4 are hydrogen in the internal olefins or a mixture of internal olefins.
According to a sixth aspect of the description, a sulfonated derivative of an internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins is provided, wherein said internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins is obtained by the metathesis of an alpha-olefin or mixture of alpha- olefins in the presence of a metathesis catalyst comprising a Group 8 transition metal complex.
Sulphonated derivatives of internal olefins or mixtures of internal olefins that have low amounts of tri-substitution on the double bond, that is, less than approximately 4 molar percent of tri-substitution, have been found to offer unique and significant performance advantages in a surfactant EOR system. Sulphonated derivatives of internal olefins, containing low amounts of tri-substitution, as described herein, exhibit lower ideal salinities than sulfonated derivatives of internal olefins having the same lengths of carbon chain, but having significant amounts of tri-substituted internal olefins. The sulfonated derivatives of internal olefins described here may offer a route for the advanced recovery of, among other things, waxy crude oil.
It has also been discovered that sulfonated derivatives of internal olefins or mixtures of internal olefins, in which internal olefins are made by metathesis of an alpha-olefin or mixture of alpha-olefins in the presence of a metathesis catalyst comprising a transition metal complex Group 8, can be advantageously used as EOR surfactants. The Group 8 transition metal complex is more fully described below. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Figure 1 describes ideal salinities for single component formulations (2% by weight of IOS; 4% by weight of Butylcellosolve®) of various IOS compositions as opposed to dean at 50 ° C by IOS name. Diamonds comprise the 95% confidence levels lower and higher than the ideal salinity averages.
Figure 2 represents ideal salinities for single component formulations (2% by weight of IOS; 4% by weight of Butylcellosolve) of various IOS compositions as opposed to dean at 50 ° C by IO name. Diamonds encompass the 95% confidence levels above and below the average ideal salinity formulations.
Figure 3 represents ideal salinities for dual component formulations (2% by weight 80: 20 IOS: branched sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium salt; 4% by weight of Butylcellosolve; 1% by weight of Na2CO3) of various IOS compositions as opposed to dodecane at 50 ° C by IOS name. Diamonds comprise the 95% confidence levels lower and higher than the ideal salinity averages.
Figure 4 represents ideal salinities for dual component formulations (2% by weight of 80: 20 IOS: branched sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium salt, 4% by weight of Butylcellosolve, 1% by weight of Na2CO3) of various IOS compositions as opposed to 50 ° C dodecane by IO name. Diamonds comprise the 95% confidence levels lower and higher than the ideal salinity averages.
Figure 5 shows the 1HNMR spectrum of Comp 10-1. The characteristics associated with unsaturation in this material are found between approximately 4.5 and 6.0 ppm.
Figure 6a illustrates a detail of the 1HNMR spectrum of Figure 5. Regions A and D are associated with residual alpha-olefin; the E region is associated with the vinylidene components (i.e., 1,1-olefins-di-substituted). Regions B and C are associated with tri-substituted 1,2-di- and 1,2,3-internal olefins, respectively. The molar% of 1,2-olefin-di-substituted is defined as the quotient of half of the integrated intensity of region B divided by the sum of half of the integrated intensity of region B and the integrated intensity of region C, multiplied by 100. The molar% of 1,2-olefin-di-substituted in region B is 79.7% (i.e., 100 x (91.95 / 2) / ((91.95 / 2) + 11.69)). This IO was used to make C-IOS-1, C-IOS-2, and C-IOS-11.
Figure 6b shows the 1HNMR spectrum of Comp IO 2A, used to make C-IOS-3, C-IOS-9, and C-IOS-10. The molar% of 1,2-olefin-di-substituted is 94.0 mol%.
Figure 6c shows the 1HNMR spectrum of Comp IO-2A used to make C-IOS-6 and C-IOS-12. The molar% of 1,2-olefin-di-substituted is 90.9 mol%.
Figure 6d depicts the 1HNMR spectrum of the internal olefin B3 used to make IOS-4. The molar% of 1,2-olefin-di-substituted is greater than 99.9%.
Figure 7 graphically represents the measurements of interfacial tension (IFT) of various formulations of EOR as opposed to several crude formulations 1-4 as opposed to oils with different salinities.
Figure 8 graphically represents the original oil recovery in place (OOIP) (%) for both water flooding and flooding with alkali surfactant polymer (ASP), using phases of the core flooding experiment.
Figure 9 graphically depicts the oil recovery from residual oil (%) for the ASP phase of the core flooding experiment.
Figure 10 graphically represents the concentration of surfactant in the effluent for the core flooding experiment.
Figure 11 graphically represents the effect of converting alpha-olefin (AO) to optimal salinity for a Single Component Formulation. This figure traces the ideal salinity as opposed to dean at 50 ° C as a function of alpha-olefin conversion. The surfactant formulation is 2% by weight of IOS, 4% by weight of Butylcellosolve. The R2 of the linear adjustment is 0.9621.
Figure 12 graphically represents the effect of alpha-olefin conversion on the ideal salinity for a Dual Component Formulation. This figure traces the ideal salinity as opposed to dodecane at 50 ° C as a function of alpha-olefin conversion. The surfactant formulation is 80:20: IOS: Petrostep® C-8 by weight (2% by weight of total surfactant), 4% by weight of Butylcellosolve, 1 by weight of sodium carbonate. The R2 of the linear adjustment is 0.9992. DESCRIPTION OF PREFERENTIAL MODALITIES Definitions
As used herein, the following terms have the following meanings, unless expressly stated otherwise:
The term "co-surfactant" refers to anionic, non-ionic, zwitterionic surfactants, amphoteric or cationic surfactants that can be used in conjunction with the sulfonated derivatives of internal olefins described here in advanced oil recovery and process compositions. The use of co-surfactants can confer greater tolerance to polyvalent ions and increase the variation of low and stable interfacial tensions between brine and crude oil. They can also provide a reduction in the viscosity of the internal olefin sulfonated surfactants disclosed herein.
The term "crude oil", as used herein, refers to hydrocarbons formed primarily from carbon and hydrogen atoms. Hydrocarbons can also include other elements, such as, but not limited to, halogen atoms, metal elements, nitrogen, oxygen and / or sulfur. Hydrocarbons derived from an oil-containing formation may include, but are not limited to, kerogen, bitumen, pyrobitumino, asphaltenes, resins, oils, or combinations thereof.
The terms "advanced oil recovery" or "EOR" as used herein refer to processes for advancing the recovery of hydrocarbons from underground reservoirs by introducing non-naturally occurring materials into the reservoir.
The terms "interfacial tension" or "IFT", as used herein, refer to the tension between oil and water of different salinities. To achieve high advanced oil recovery, it is often necessary to reduce the interfacial tension between oil and reservoir water to less than approximately 0.01 mN / m. Interfacial stresses can be measured using a rotary drop tensiometer or making observations of phase behavior according to the methods described in Levitt, D.B .; Jackson, A.C .; Heinson, C .; Britton, L.N .; Malik, T .; Dwarakanath, V .; Papa, G.A., Identification and Evaluation of High Performance EOR Surfactants. SPE 2006, (100,089), 1 - 11, Levitt, D.B. Experimental Evaluation of High Performance EOR Surfactants for a Dolomite Oil Reservoir. University of Texas, Austin, 2006, Zhao, P .; Jackson, A. C .; Britton, C .; Kim, D. H .; Britton, L. N .; Levitt, D. B., Development of High-Performance Surfactants for Difficult Oils. SPE 2008, (113432). The interfacial tension can also be measured using any known method for measuring the interfacial tension.
The term "microemulsion", as used herein, refers to a thermodynamically stable micellar dispersion of brine, oil, the internal olefin sulfonated surfactant described herein and, optionally, one or more additional components. Microemulsions are defined as emulsions having an average particle size of less than approximately one hundred nanometers. Mixtures of water, oil, salt, surfactants and other components mentioned above can be described as exhibiting Winsor type I, II or III behavior. Type I Winsor systems are those that can be distinguished by oil solubilized in the aqueous phase; Type II Winsor systems are those that can be distinguished through water solubilized in the oil phase. Type III Winsor systems are microemulsions that can coexist with both phases of excess oil and excess brine. The transition from a phase behavior of type I to type III to type II systems is known to be caused by the alteration of a variable, such as salinity, temperature, surfactant, or oil composition. It is generally known and widely accepted that microemulsions in which approximately equal volumes of oil and aqueous components are solubilized provide smaller IFTs.
The term "petroleum-containing formation" as used herein refers to underground reservoirs composed of one or more layers containing hydrocarbons, one or more layers without hydrocarbons, an overload and / or an underload. An "overload" and / or an "underload" can include one or more different types of impermeable materials. For example, overload / underload may include rock, shale, lamite, or wet / firm carbonate (for example, a waterproof carbonate without hydrocarbons). For example, a subload may contain shale or lamite. In some cases, the earth / underload layer may be slightly permeable. For example, an underload can be made up of a permeable mineral such as sandstone or limestone. Properties of a hydrocarbon formation containing hydrocarbons can affect how hydrocarbons flow through an underload / overload to one or more production wells. Properties can include, but are not limited to, porosity, permeability, pore size distribution, surface area, salinity or formation temperature. Overload / underload properties in combination with hydrocarbon properties, such as capillary pressure characteristics (static) and relative permeability characteristics (flow) can affect the mobilization of hydrocarbons through the formation containing oil.
The term "ideal salinity", as used herein, refers to salinity in which substantially equal amounts in volume of oil and brine are solubilized in the micro-emulsion and the interfacial tension between the micro-emulsion and the excess brine phase substantially equal to the interfacial tension between the microemulsion and the excess oil phase.
The term "waxy crude oil", as used herein, refers to crude oil having an API value of less than 22.3 ° and generally containing a variety of light and intermediate hydrocarbons, such as paraffins and aromatic hydrocarbons, wax paraffins and a variety of other heavy organic compounds, such as resins and asphaltenes. Alpha-olefin raw material
Alpha-olefin raw materials that can be advantageously used in the practice of the description are the alpha-olefins corresponding to the formula R5HC = CH2, where R5 is a straight or branched saturated chain C3-C22 hydrocarbyl group. While the R5 group may contain a certain amount of alkyl branching, depending on the process used to make the alpha olefin feed material, the R5 groups with low amounts of alkyl branching, that is, on the order of less than approximately 6 , preferably less than approximately 3, more preferably less than approximately 2, more preferably less than approximately 1 mol% of alkyl branching, are particularly advantageous for the practice of the present description. In a presently preferred embodiment of the present description, the alpha-olefin feedstock comprises an alpha-olefin corresponding to the formula R5HC: = CH2 where R5 is a C8, C9, C10, Cn, or C12 hydrocarbyl group, more preferably, a C8, C10 or C12 hydrocarbyl group, or a mixture of two or more different alpha-olefins, where R5 is a Cs, Cg, Cm, Cu, or C-12 hydrocarbyl group, more preferably a Cs, C10 or hydrocarbyl group Cp. According to this preferred embodiment, small amounts, i.e., combined amounts of less than approximately five weight percent, of hydrocarbyl groups <C8 and> Ci2 R5 can be present in the alpha-olefin feedstock. Non-limiting examples of alpha-olefin from raw materials that are useful in the practice of this description may contain the following:

[0044] Alpha-olefins can be derived from ethylene oligomerization, in the presence of either organoaluminium compounds, transition metal catalysts or acidic zeolites to produce a wide range of chain lengths, which are further purified by known means , preferably from distillation. See, for example, U.S. Patent No. 3,647,906, 4,727,203 and 4,895,997 to Shell Oil Co., U.S. Patent No. 5,849,974 to Amoco Corporation, and U.S. Patent No. 6,281,404 to Chevron. Chemicals, each of which is incorporated herein by reference for its descriptions of suitable catalysts and processing conditions for ethylene oligomerization. Such alpha-olefin raw materials are commercially available from a variety of sources, including Shell Chemicals, Exxon Chemicals Ineos and Chevron Phillips Chemical Company.
[0045] Alpha-olefins can also be derived from the co-metathesis of a saturated glyceride containing the composition and ethylene. While ethylene is presently preferred, a lower alpha-olefin or a mixture of lower alpha-olefins, such as 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, and the like, and combinations of ethylene and one or more lower alpha-olefins, can be used in the co-metathesis reaction with unsaturated glycerides. The co-metathesis reaction can be conducted in the presence of any suitable metathesis catalyst, such as those described hereinafter, under suitable metathesis reaction conditions. When unsaturated glycerides rich in oleic acid esters are modified by co-metathesis with ethylene, the main alpha-olefin produced is 1-decene. This reaction is described in U.S. Patent No. 4,545,941, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference for its description of the co-metathesis reaction of unsaturated glycerides and ethylene and products obtained in this way. Suitable unsaturated glycerides containing compositions can be derived from natural oils such as oils of vegetable origin or fats of animal origin. Representative examples of vegetable oils include canola oil, canola oil, coconut oil, corn oil, cottonseed oil, olive oil, palm oil, peanut oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, soybean oil, sunflower oil, linseed oil, palm kernel oil, tung oil, castor oil and the like. Representative examples of animal fats include lard, tallow, chicken fat (yellow fat), and fish oil. Other useful oils include pine oil and seaweed oil. It will be recognized by those skilled in the art that unsaturated glycerides containing relatively high amounts of esters of polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as esters of linoleic acid and esters of linolenic acid, for example, soybean oil, can be modified by means of hydrogenation. to obtain higher levels of monounsaturated oleic acid esters in modified glycerides. These glycerides can be modified by metathesis to increase the yield of 1-decene compared to the yields of 1-decene obtained from unmodified glycerides. Metathesis Products
In one embodiment of the description, the alpha-olefin raw material described above, optionally in combination with one or more other unsaturated compounds, is subjected to reaction conditions by metathesis, in the presence of a suitable metathesis catalyst, especially one comprising a Group 8 transition metal complex. The metathesis reaction can be used to produce suitable long-chain internal olefins that can subsequently be sulfonated to produce a sulfonated derivative that can be advantageously employed in advanced oil recovery compositions.
The metathesis reaction described above can result in the production of an internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins in which said internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins corresponds to formula (I):
where R1, R2, R3 and R4 are the same or different and are hydrogen or saturated straight or branched chain hydrocarbyl groups, and the total number of carbon atoms in R1, R2, R3 and R4 is 6 to 44, with the caveat that at least approximately 96 molar percent of R1 and R3 are saturated straight or branched chain hydrocarbyl groups and at least approximately 96 molar percent of R2 and R4 are hydrogen in the internal olefins or mixture of internal olefins.
The reaction product resulting from the metathesis reaction described above may itself constitute a mixture containing the internal olefins or a mixture of internal olefins, as described herein in combination with components other than the internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins. Examples of such components, in addition to internal olefins that can be found in such mixtures include alpha-olefins and vinylidenes. Where the metathesis reaction does not proceed to completion, the reaction product may contain appreciable amounts of alpha-olefin. Such reaction products containing mixtures of internal olefins in combination with other components can be subjected to sulfonation conditions to produce compositions that can be advantageously employed in advanced oil recovery compositions, without the need to remove any components other than internal olefins, both of the mixtures themselves and of the products resulting from the sulfonation of these mixtures. If desired, these components can be removed from the mixtures or products resulting from the sulfonation of these mixtures by any other removal technique known to those skilled in the art, for example, distillation, chromatography, precipitation and selective adsorption. Non-limiting examples of such mixtures may contain the following:

In another embodiment of the description, a saturated glyceride containing composition as defined above, is modified by auto-metathesis to produce a reaction product that contains at least one internal long-chain olefin that can be subsequently sulfonated, and used as a surfactant for advanced oil recovery. For example, a natural oil, containing relatively high amounts of oleic acid esters, for example, soybean oil or olive oil, can be modified by auto-metathesis to produce a reaction product containing C18 internal olefins corresponding to the formula (I ) above. This type of auto-metathesis reaction is described in JC Mol, Green Chemistry, 2002, 4, 5-13, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference for its description of auto-metathesis and cross-metathesis of unsaturated glycerides and fatty acids, catalysts useful in such reactions, and reaction products thus obtained. Metathesis catalysts:
The metathesis reactions described above can be conducted in the presence of a catalytically effective amount of a metathesis catalyst. The term "metathesis catalyst" includes any catalyst or catalyst system that catalyzes the reaction by metathesis.
Any metathesis catalyst known or developed in the future can be used, alone or in combination with one or more additional catalysts. Exemplary metathesis catalysts include catalysts based on transition metals, for example, ruthenium, osmium, molybdenum, chromium, rhenium and tungsten, as well as any suitable highly selective metathesis catalyst for the formation of internal linear olefins with low amounts of tri-substitution , as described in this document. See, for example, Gibson, T .; Tulich, L. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1821-1823, Doyle, G. J. Cat. 1973, 30, 118-127, Spronk, R .; Mol, J. C. Applied Catalysis 1991, 70, 295-306 and Fox, H. H .; Schrock, R. R .; O'Dell, R. Organometallics 1994, 13, 635- 639, Olefin Metathesis and Metathesis Polymerization by Ivin and Mol (1997), and Chemical and Engineering News, vol. 80, no. 51, Dec. 23, 2002, pp. 29-33, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference for its descriptions of metathesis catalysts which may be useful in the practice of the present description. Illustrative examples of suitable catalysts include ruthenium and osmium carbene catalysts as disclosed by U.S. Patent No. 5,342,909, 5,312,940, 5,728,917, 5,750,815, 5,710,298, 5,831,108 and 5,728,785, all which are hereby incorporated by reference.
In certain embodiments, the metathesis catalyst is preferably a Group 8 transition metal complex having the structure of formula (III)
wherein the various substituents are as follows: M is a transition metal of Group 8; L1, L2 and L3 are neutral electron donor ligands; n is 0 or 1, such that L3 may or may not be present; m is 0, 1 or 2; X1 and X2 are each independently anionic ligands; and R1 and R2 are independently selected from hydrogen, hydrocarbyl, substituted hydrocarbyl, hydrocarbyl containing heteroatom, hydrocarbyl containing substituted heteroatom, and functional groups, in which any two or more of X1, X2, L1, L2, L3, R1 and R2 can be taken together to form a cyclic group, and in addition any one or more of X1, X2, L1, L2, L3, R1 and R2 can be attached to a support.
In addition, any of the catalyst ligands can additionally include one or more functional groups. Examples of suitable functional groups include, but are not limited to, hydroxyl, thiol, thioether, ketone, aldehyde, ester, ether, amine, imine, amide, nitro, carboxylic acid, disulfide, carbonate, isocyanate, carbodiimide, carboalkoxy, carbamate and halogen .
Preferred catalysts contain Ru or Os as the Group 8 transition metal, with Ru being particularly preferred.
Various modes of catalysts useful in the reactions of the description are described in more detail below. For the sake of convenience, catalysts are described in groups, but it should be noted that these groups are not intended to be limiting in any way. That is, any of the catalysts useful in the description may fit the description of more than one of the groups described herein.
A first group of catalysts, then, is generally referred to as first generation Grubbs type catalysts, and has the structure of formula (III). For the first group of catalysts, M and m are as described above, and n, X1, X2, L1, L2, L3, R1 and R2 are described as follows.
For the first group of catalysts, n is 0, and L1 and L2 are independently selected from phosphine, sulfonated phosphine, phosphite, phosphite, phosphonite, arsine, stibin, ether, amine, amide, imine, sulfoxide, carboxyl, nitrosyl, pyridine, substituted pyridine, imidazole, substituted imidazole, pyrazine, and thioether. Exemplary ligands are tri-substituted phosphines. X1 and X2 are anionic ligands and can be the same or different, or they are linked together to form a cyclic group, typically, though not necessarily, a five to eight membered ring. In preferred embodiments, X1 and X2 are each independently hydrogen, halide, or one of the following groups: C1-C2oalkyl, C5-C24 aryl, C1-C20 alkoxy, C5-C24 aryloxy, C2-C2o alkoxycarbonyl, C6-C24 aryloxycarbonyl , C2-C24 acyl, C2-C24 acyloxy, C1-C20 alkylsulfonate, Cs-C24 arylsulfonate, C- | C2o alkylsulfanyl, C5-C24 arylsulfanyl, C-C20alkylsulfinyl or C5-C24 arylsulfinyl. Optionally, X1 and X2 can be replaced with one or one or more parts selected from C- | -Ci2alkyl, Ci-C12 alkoxy, C5-C24 aryl, and a halide, which can, in turn, with the exception of halide, be further substituted by one or more groups selected from halide, C1 -C6 alkyl, CrC6 alkoxy and phenyl. In more preferred embodiments, X1 and X2 are halide, benzoate, C2-C6 acyl, C2-C6 alkoxycarbonyl, C- | -C6alkyl, phenoxy, C-i-Cβ alkoxy, C-i-C6alkylsulfanyl, aryl or C1-C6alkylsulfonyl. In even more preferred embodiments, X1 and X2 are each halide, CF3CO2, CH3CO2, CFH2CO2> (CH3) 3CO, (CF3) 2 (CH3) CO, (CF3) (CH3) 2CO, PhO, MeO, EtO, tosylate, mesylate or trifluoromethane-sulfonate. In the most preferred embodiments, X1 and X2 are each chloride. R1 and R2 are independently selected from hydrogen, hydrocarbyl (for example, CrC2o alkyl, C2-C20 alkenyl, C2-C20 alkynyl, C5-C24 aryl, C6-C24 alkaryl, C6-C24 aralkyl, etc.), substituted hydrocarbyl (by example, substituted C1-C20alkyl, C2-C2o alkenyl, C2-C20 alkynyl, C5-C24 aryl, C6-C24 alkaryl, C6-C24 aralkyl etc.), heteroatom-containing hydrocarbyl (for example, heteroatom-containing C-C20alkyl, C2- C20 alkenyl, C2-C20 alkynyl, C5-C24 aryl, Ce-C24 alkaryl, C6-C24 aralkyl, etc.) and substituted heteroatom containing hydrocarbyl (e.g., substituted heteroatom containing C1-C20alkyl, C2-C20 alkenyl, C2-C20 alkynyl, C5-C24 aryl, C6-C24 alkaryl, C6-C24 aralkyl etc.), and functional groups. R1 and R2 can also be linked to form a cyclic group, which can be aliphatic or aromatic, and can contain substituents and / or heteroatoms. Generally, such a cyclic group will contain 4 to 12, preferably 5, 6, 7 or 8 ring atoms.
In preferred catalysts, R1 is hydrogen and R2 is selected from C-1-C20 alkyl, C2-C20 alkenyl and C5-C24 aryl, more preferably C- | -C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl and C5-C14 aryl. Even more preferably, R2 is phenyl, vinyl, methyl, isopropyl or t-butyl, optionally substituted with one or more radicals selected from C1 -C6 alkyl, C-i-C alkoxy, phenyl, and a functional group Fn as defined hereinbefore. More preferably, R2 is phenyl or vinyl substituted with one or more radicals selected from methyl, ethyl, chlorine, bromine, iodine, fluorine, nitro, dimethylamino, methyl, methoxy and phenyl. Ideally, R2 is phenyl or —OC (CH3) 2.
Any two or more (typically two, three, or four) among X1, X2, L1, L2, L3, R1, and R2 can be taken together to form a cyclic group, as described, for example, in the U.S. Patent No. 5,312,940 to Grubbs et al. When any one of X1, X2, L1, L2, L3, R1 and R2 are linked to form cyclic groups, these cyclic groups can contain 4 to 12, preferably 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 atoms, or can comprise two or three of such rings, which can be either fused or bonded. Cyclic groups can be aliphatic or aromatic, and can contain heteroatom and / or be substituted. The cyclic group may, in some cases, form a bidentate ligand or a tridentate ligand. Examples of bidentated ligands include, but are not limited to, bisphosphines, dialkoxides, alkyldicetonate and aryldicetonates.
A second group of catalysts, generally referred to as second generation Grubbs type catalysts, has the structure of formula (III), where L1 is a carbene binder with the structure of formula (IV)
such that the complex can have the structure of formula (V)
wherein M, m, n, X1, X2, L2, L3, R1 and R2 are as defined for the first group of catalysts, and the remaining substituents are as follows. X and Y are typically heteroatoms selected from N, O, S and P. Since O and S are divalent, p is necessarily zero when X is O or S, and q is necessarily zero when Y is O or S. when X is N or P, then p is 1, and when Y is N or P, then q is 1. In a preferred embodiment, both X and Y are N. Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 are ligands, for example, hydrocarbilene (including substituted hydrocarbilene, hydrocarbilene containing heteroatom, and hydrocarbilene containing substituted heteroatom, such alkylene as containing heteroatom and / or substituted) or - (CO) -, ew, x, y and z are independently zero or 1, which means that each linker is optional. Preferably, w, x, y, and z are zero. In addition, two or more substituents on adjacent atoms within Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 can be linked to form an additional cyclic group. R3, R3A, R4 and R4A are independently selected from hydrogen, hydrocarbyl, substituted hydrocarbyl, hydrocarbyl containing heteroatom, and hydrocarbyl containing substituted heteroatom.
In addition, any two or more of X1, X2, L1, L2, L3, R1, R2, R3, R3A, R4 and R4A can be taken together to form a cyclic group, and any one or more of X1, X2, L1, L2, L3, R1, R2, R3, R3A, R4 and R4A and can be connected to a support.
Preferably, R3A and R4A are linked to form a cyclic group so that the carbene linker is a heterocyclic carbene and preferably an N-heterocyclic carbene, such as N-heterocyclic carbene having the structure of formula (VI):
wherein R3 and R4 are defined as above, with preferably at least one of R3 and R4, and more preferably both R3 and R4, 5 being alicyclic or aromatic from one to approximately five rings, and optionally containing one or more heteroatoms and / or substituents. Q is a linker, typically a hydrocarbilene linker, including substituted hydrocarbilene, containing hydrocarbene heteroatom, and hydrocarbilene linkers containing substituted hetero atoms, where two or more substituents on adjacent atoms within Q can also be linked to form an additional cyclic structure, which can likewise be substituted to provide a fused polycyclic structure of two to approximately five cyclic groups. Q is often, although again, not necessarily, a bond of two atoms or a bond of three atoms.
Examples of suitable N-heterocyclic carbene ligands such as L1 thus include, but are not limited to, the following:


When M is ruthenium and then the preferred complexes have the structure of formula (VII):

In a more preferred embodiment, Q is a bond of two atoms having the structure —CR11 R12 — CR13R14 or —CR11 = CR13—, preferably, —CR11R12 — CR13R14—, in which R11, R12, R13 and R14 are independently selected from hydrogen, hydrocarbyl, substituted hydrocarbyl, hydrocarbyl containing heteroatom, hydrocarbyl containing substituted heteroatom, and functional groups. Examples of functional groups here include carboxyl, C1-C20 alkoxy, C5-C24 aryloxy, C2-C20 alkoxycarbonyl, C5-C24 alkoxycarbonyl, C2-C24acyloxy, C1-C20 alkylthio, C5-C24 arylthio, C1-C20alkylsulfonyl, and Ci-C20alkyl, and Ci-C20alkyl optionally substituted by one or more fractions selected from C1-12 alkyl, C1-12 alkoxy, C5-C14 aryl, hydroxyl, sulfhydryl, formyl and halide. R11, R12, R13 and R14 are preferably independently selected from hydrogen, C- | -C12alkyl, substituted C1 -C2 alkyl, C1-C12 heteroalkyl, substituted C-i-C-i2 heteroalkyl. Alternatively, any two of R11, R12, R13 and R14 can be linked together to form a substituted or unsubstituted saturated or unsaturated ring structure, for example, a C4-C-i2 alicyclic group or a C5 or C6 aryl group, which may itself be replaced, for example, by bonded or fused alicyclic or aromatic groups, or by other substituents.
When R3 and R4 are aromatic, they are typically, though not necessarily, composed of one or two aromatic rings, which may or may not be substituted, for example, R3 and R4 may be phenyl, substituted phenyl, biphenyl, substituted biphenyl, or the like. In a preferred embodiment, R3 and R4 are the same and each is unsubstituted phenyl or phenyl substituted by up to three substituents selected from C1 -C2o alkyl, substituted C1 -C2 alkyl, C1-C20 heteroalkyl, C1-C20 substituted heteroalkyl, C5-C24 aryl, C5-C24 substituted aryl, C5-C24 heteroaryl, C6-C24 aralkyl, C6-C24 alkaryl or halide. Preferably, any substituents present are hydrogen, C1 -C2 alkyl, C- | -C12 alkoxy, Cs-C14 aryl, substituted C5-C14 aryl, or halide. As an example, R3 and R4 are mesityl.
In a third group of catalysts with the structure of formula (III), M, m, n, X1, X2, R1 and R2 are as defined for the first group of catalysts, L1 is a highly coordinating neutral electron donor ligand, like any of those described for the first and second groups of catalysts, and L2 and L3 are weakly coordinating neutral electron donor ligands in the form of optionally substituted heterocyclic groups. Again, n is zero or 1, so that L3 may or may not be present. Generally, in the third group of catalysts, L2 and L3 are optionally substituted with five or six membered monocyclic groups containing 1 to 4, preferably 1 to 3, more preferably 1 to 2 heteroatoms, or are optionally substituted bicyclic or polycyclic structures composed of 2 to 5 monocyclic groups of such five or six members. If the heterocyclic group is substituted, it must not be replaced by a coordinating hetero atom, and any cyclic moiety within a heterocyclic group will generally not be substituted with more than 3 substituents.
For the third group of catalysts, examples of L2 and L3 include, without limitation, heterocycles containing nitrogen, sulfur, oxygen, or a mixture thereof.
Examples of nitrogen-containing heterocycles suitable for L2 and L3 include pyridine, bipyridine, pyridazine, pyrimidine, bipyridamine, pyrazine, 1,3,5-triazine, 1,2,4-triazine, 1,2,3-triazine, pyrrole, 2H-pyrrole, 3H-pyrrole, pyrazole, 2H-imidazole, 1,2,3-triazole, 1,2,4-triazole, indole, 3H-indole, 1H-isoindole, cyclopenta (b) pyridine, indazole, quinoline, bisquinoline, isoquinoline, bis isoquinoline, cinoline, quinazoline, naphthyridine, piperidine, piperazine, pyrrolidine, pyrazolidine, quinuclidine, imidazolidine, picolylimine, purine, benzimidazole, bisimidazole, phenazine, acridine, and carbazole.
Examples of sulfur-containing heterocycles suitable for L2 and L3 include thiophene, 1,2-dithiol, 1,3-dithiol, tiepin, benzo (b) thiophene, benzo (c) thiophene, thionaftene, dibenzothiophene, 2H-thiopiran, 4H-thiopiran , and thioanthrene.
Examples of suitable oxygen-containing heterocycles for L2 and L3 include 2H-pyran, 4H-pyran, 2-pyran, 4-pyran, 1,2-dioxin, 1,3-dioxin, oxepin, furan, 2H-1, -benzopyran, coumarin, coumarone, chromene, chroman-4-one, isochromen-1-one, isochromen-3-one, xanthene, tetrahydrofuran, 1,4-dioxane, and dibenzofuran.
Examples of suitable mixed heterocycles for L2 and L3 include isoxazole, oxazole, thiazole, isothiazole, 1,2,3-oxadiazole, 1,2,4-oxadiazole, 1,3,4-oxadiazole, 1,2,3,4- oxatriazole, 1,2,3,5-oxatriazole, 3H-1,2,3-dioxazole, 3H-1,2-oxathiol, 1,3-oxathiol, 4H-1,2-oxazine, 2H-1,3- oxazine, 1,4-oxazine, 1,2,5-oxathiazine, o-isooxazine, phenoxazine, phenothiazine, pyran [3,4-b] pyrrole, indoxazine, benzoxazole, anthranil, and morpholine.
Preferred L2 and L3 ligands are aromatic heterocyclic ligands containing nitrogen and containing oxygen, and particularly preferred L2 and L3 ligands are monocyclic N-heteroaryl ligands that are optionally substituted with 1 to 3, preferably 1 or 2, substituents. Specific examples of particularly preferred L2 and L3 ligands are substituted pyridines and pyridines, such as 3-bromopyridine, 4-bromopyridine, 3,5-dibromopyridine, 2,4,6-tribromopyridine, 2,6-dibromopyridine, 3-chloropyridine, 4-chloropyridine, 3,5-dichloropyridine, 2,4,6-trichloropyridine, 2,6-dichloropyridine, 4-iodopyridine, 3,5-diiodopyridine, 3,5-dibromo-4-methylpyridine, 3,5-dichloro- 4-methylpyridine, 3,5-dimethyl-4-bromopyridine, 3,5-dimethylpyridine, 4-methylpyridine, 3,5-diisopropylpyridine, 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine, 2,4,6-triisopropylpyridine, 4- (tert -butyl) -pyridine, 4-phenylpyridine, 3,5-diphenylpyridine, 3,5-dichloro-4-phenylpyridine, and the like.
Generally speaking, any substituents present in L2 and / or L3 are selected from halo, C-1-C20 alkyl, substituted CrC2o alkyl, C1-C20 heteroalkyl, substituted C1-C20 heteroalkyl, C5-C24 aryl, C5-C24 aryl substituted, C5-C24 heteroaryl, C5-C24 substituted heteroaryl, C6-C24 alkaryl, C6-C24 substituted alkaryl, C6-C24 heteroalkyl, substituted C6-C24 heteroalkyl, C6-C24 aralkyl, Ce-C24 substituted aralkyl, C6-C24 heteroaralkyl , C6-C24 substituted heteroaralkyl, and functional groups, with suitable functional groups, including, without limitation, C1-C20 alkoxy, C5-C24 aryloxy, C2-C20 alkylcarbonyl, C6-C24 arylcarbonyl, C2-C20 alkylcarbonyloxy, C2- C20 arylcarbonyloxy, C2-C2o alkoxycarbonyl, C6-C24 aryloxycarbonyl, halocarbonyl, C2-C2o alkylcarbonate, C6-C2 C6-C24 arylcarbonate, carboxy, carboxylate, carbamoyl, mono- (C1-C2oalkyl) - substituted carbamoyl (carbamoyl) substituted alkyl) -carbamoyl, di-N— (C-1-C20 alkyl), N— (C5-C24 aryl) -carbam substituted oyl, substituted mono- (C5-C24 aryl) -carbamoyl, substituted di- (C6-C24 aryl) -carbamoyl, thiocarbamoyl, mono- (C 1 -C 2 alkyl) - substituted thiocarbamoyl, di- (C 1 -C 2 alkyl) - substituted thiocarbamoyl, substituted di-N- (CrC2o alkyl) -N- (C6-C24 aryl) -thiocarbamoyl, substituted mono- (C6-C24 aryl) -thiocarbamoyl, di- (C6-C24 aryl) -titocarbamoyl, carbamido, formyl, thioformyl, amino, substituted mono- (C1-C2o alkyl) -amino, substituted di- (C1 -C2oalkyl) -amino, substituted mono- (C5-C24 aryl) -amino, di- (C5-C24 aryl) - substituted amino, di-N— (CrC2o alkyl), N- (C5-C24 aryl) - substituted amino, C2-C2o alkyl starch, C6-C24 aryl starch, imino, CrC2o alkylimino, C5-C24 arylimino, nitro and nitrous. In addition, two adjacent substituents can be taken together to form a ring, in general, a ring of five or six members alicyclic or aryl, optionally containing 1 to 3 heteroatoms and 1 to 3 substituents as above.
Preferred substituents on L2 and L3 include, without limitation, halo, C - [- C12 alkyl, substituted C-1-C-12 alkyl, C1 -C12 heteroalkyl, substituted C- | -C12 heteroalkyl, C5-C14 aryl, C5-C14 aryl substituted, C5-C14 heteroaryl, C5-C14 substituted heteroaryl, C6-C16 alkaryl, Ce-Cw substituted alkaryl, C6-Ci6 heteroalkyl, C6-C16 heteroalkyl substituted, Ce-C16 aralkyl, C6-C16 aralkyl substituted, Ce-Ci6 heteroaralkyl , C6-C16 substituted heteroaralkyl, Cj-C12 alkoxy, C5-C14 aryloxy, C2-C12 alkylcarbonyl, Cβ-C14 arylcarbonyl, C2-C-i2 alkylcarbonyloxy, Cβ-C14arylcarbonyloxy, C2-C2 alkoxycarbonyl, formoxycarbonyl, C6-alkoxycarbonyl, C6-alkoxycarbonyl, C6-alkoxycarbonyl, C6-alkoxycarbonyl. , amino, substituted mono- (C1 -C12 alkyl) -amino, substituted di- (CrCi2 alkyl) -amino, substituted mono- (C5-C14aryl) -amino, substituted di- (C5-C-i4aryl) -amino, and nitro.
From the above, the most preferred substituents are halo, C1 -C6 alkyl, C1-C6 haloalkyl, CrC6 alkoxy, phenyl, substituted phenyl, formyl, N, N-diC-Cθ alkyl) amino, nitro, and nitrogen heterocycles, such as described above (including, for example, pyrrolidine, piperidine, piperazine, pyrazine, pyrimidine, pyridine, pyridazine, etc.) L and L can also be taken together to form a bidentate or multidentate ligand, containing two or more, usually two, coordinating heteroatoms, such as N, O, S, or P, with such preferred ligands being Brookhart-type diimine ligands. A representative bidentate ligand has the structure of formula (VIII)
heteroatom-containing alkaryl), or (1) R15 and R16, (2) R17 and R18, (3) R16 and R17, or (4) both R15 and R16, and R17 and R18, can be taken together to form a ring , that is, an N-heterocycle. Preferred cyclic groups in such a case are five- and six-membered rings, typically aromatic rings.
In a fourth group of catalysts having the structure of formula (III), two of the substituents are taken together to form a bidentate ligand or a tridentate ligand. Examples of bidentated ligands include, but are not limited to, bisphosphines, dialkoxides, alkyldetonetonates and aryldichetonates. Specific examples include —P (Ph) 2CH2CH2P (Ph) 2-, —How (Ph) 2CH2CH2As (Ph2) -, —P (Ph) 2CH2CH2C (CF3) 2O—, binaftolate diions, pinacolate diions, - P (CH3) 2 (CH2) 2P (CH3) 2-, and —OC (CH3) 2 (CH3) 2CO—. Preferred bidentate ligands are —P (Ph) 2 CH2CH2P (Ph) 2- and - P (CH3) 2 (CH2) 2P (CH3) 2_. Tridentated ligands include, but are not limited to, (CH3) 2 NCH2CH2P (Ph) CH2CH2N (CH3) 2. Other preferred tridentate ligands are those in which any of the three symbols X1, X2, L1, L2, L3, R1 and R2 (for example, X1, L1 and L2) are taken together to be cyclopentadienyl, indenyl, or fluorenyl, each one optionally substituted with C2-C2o alkenyl, C2-C2o alkynyl, C1-C20 alkyl, C5-C2o aryl, CrC20 alkoxy, C2-C20 alkenyloxy, C2-C2o alkynyloxy, C5-C2o-aryloxy, C2-C20 alkoxycarbonyl, Ci- C20 alkylthio, CrC2o alkylsulfonyl, or C-1-C20 alkylsulfinyl, each of which may further be substituted with C1-C6 alkyl, halide, C1-C6 alkoxy or with a phenyl group optionally substituted with a halide, C1-Cβ alkyl, or Ci-Ce alkoxy. More preferably, in compounds of this type, X, L1 and L2 are taken together to be cyclopentadienyl or indenyl, each optionally substituted with vinyl, C-1-C-10 alkyl, C5-C20 aryl, CrC10 carboxylate, C2-C10 alkoxycarbonyl, Cr C10 alkoxy, or C5-C20 aryloxy, each optionally substituted by C1 -C6 alkyl, halide, C1 -C6 alkoxy or by a phenyl group optionally substituted with halide, C1C alkyl or C-pC alkoxy. More preferably, X, L1 and L2 can be taken together to be cyclopentadienyl, optionally substituted with vinyl, hydrogen, methyl or phenyl. Four-stranded ligands include, but are not limited to, O2C (CH2) 2P (Ph) (CH2) 2P (Ph) (CH2) 2CO2, phthalocyanines, and porphyrins.
The complexes to which L2 and R2 are linked are examples of the fourth group of catalysts, and are generally called "Hoveyda-Grubbs" catalysts. Examples of Hoveyda-Grubbs-type catalysts include the following:
wherein L1, X1, X2 and M are as described for any of the other groups of catalysts.
In addition to the catalysts having the structure of formula (III), as described above, other transition metal carbene complexes include, but are not limited to: osmium or neutral ruthenium metal carbene complexes containing metal centers that are formally in the +2 oxidation state, they have an electron count of 16, are penta-coordinated, and have the general formula 10 (IX); osmium or neutral ruthenium metal carbene complexes containing metal centers that are formally in the +2 oxidation state, have an electron count of 18, are hexa-coordinated, and have the general formula (X); osmium carbide or cationic ruthenium metal complexes containing metal centers that are formally in the +2 oxidation state, have an electron count of 14, are tetra-coordinated, and have the general formula (XI); and osmium or cationic ruthenium metal carbene complexes containing metal centers that are formally in the +2 oxidation state, have an electron count of 14, are tetra-coordinated, and have the general formula (XII)
wherein: X1, X2, L1, L2, n, L3, R1 and R2 are as defined for any of the four groups of catalysts defined above; res are independently zero or 1; t is an integer in the range zero to 5; Y is any non-coordinating anion (for example, a halide ion, BF4-, etc.); Z1 and Z2 are independently selected from — O—, —S—, - NR2—, —PR2—, - P (= O) R2—, - P (OR2) -, - P (= O) (OR2) -, —C (= O) -, - C (= O) O—, - OC (= O) -, —OC (= O) O -, - S (= O) -, and —S (= O )two-; Z3 is any cationic portion such as —P (R2) 3+ or —N (R2) 3+; and any two or more of X1, X2, L1, L2, L3, n, Z1, Z2, Z3, R1 and R2 can be taken together to form a cyclic group, for example, a multidentate ligand, and in which any or more among X1, X2, L1, L2, n, L3, Z1, Z2, Z3, R1 and R2 can be attached to a support.
Other suitable complexes include Group 8 transition metal carbenes containing a cationic substituent, as described in U.S. Patent No. 7,365,140 (Piers et al.) With the general structure (XIII):
where: M is a transition metal of Group 8; L1 and L2 are neutral electron donor ligands; X1 and X2 are the anionic ligands; R1 represents hydrogen, C1 -C12 hydrocarbyl, or substituted C1 -C2 hydrocarbyl; W is an optionally substituted hydrocarbilene bond and / or heteroatom containing CrC2o bond; Y is an element substituted with hydrogen from the positively charged Group 15 or Group 16, C1-C12 hydrocarbyl, C1-C12 substituted hydrocarbyl; hydrocarbyl containing C1 -C4 heteroatom, OR substituted heteroatom containing hydrocarbyl; Z is a negatively charged counterion; m is zero or 1; and n is zero or 1; wherein any two or more L1, L2, X1, X2, R1, W and Y can be taken together to form a cyclic group.
Each of M, L1, L2, X1 and X2 in the structure (XIII) can be as previously defined here. W is a heteroatom hydrocarbilene bond containing 0 ^ 020 and / or optionally substituted, typically an optionally substituted C1-C12 alkylene bond, for example - - (CH2) Í—, where i is an integer in the range 1 to 12 inclusive and any of the hydrogen atoms can be replaced by a substituent other than hydrogen, as described earlier in this document. The subscript n is zero or 1, which means that W may or may not be present. In a preferred embodiment, n is zero. Y is a positively charged Group 15 or Group 16 hydrogen substituted element, CrCC hydrocarbyl, substituted CrCi2 hydrocarbyl, hydrocarbyl containing C- | -C- | 2 heteroatom, or substituted heteroatom containing hydrocarbyl. Preferably, Y is a positively charged Group 15 or Group 16 element, substituted with C 1 -C 12 hydrocarbyl. Representative groups of Y include P (R2) 3, P (R2) 3, As (R2) 3, S (R2) 2, O (R2) 2, where R2 is independently selected from C 1 -C 2 alkyl hydrocarbyl; within these, preferred Y groups are phosphines of the P (R2) 3 structure, where R2 is independently selected from C1 -C12 alkyl and aryl and therefore includes, for example, methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl , n-butyl, isobutyl, t-butyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl and phenyl. Y can also be a heterocyclic group containing the positively charged Group 15 or Group 16 element. For example, when the Group 15 or Group 16 element is nitrogen, Y may be an optionally substituted pyridinyl, pyrazinyl or imidazolyl group. Z 'is a negatively charged counterion associated with the cationic complex, and can be virtually any anion, as long as the anion is inert in relation to the complex components and the reagents used in the catalyzed metathesis reaction. Preferred Z parts are weakly coordinating anions, such as, for example, [B (C6F5) 4] ", [BF4]", [B (C6H6) 4] ", [CF3S (O) 3]", [PF6] [SbF6] ", [AICI4]", [FSO3] ", [CBuHβClβ]", [CBnHeBrθ] and [SO3F: SbF5] ". Preferred preferred anions such as Z ~ are of the formula B (R15) 4- wherein R15 is fluoro, aryl, aryl or perfluorinated, typically fluoro or perfluorinated aryl. Most suitable preferred anions such as Z ~ are BF4 “and BÍCeFs) - ideally the latter.
It should be emphasized that any two or more of X1, X2, L1, L2, R1, W and Y can be taken together to form a cyclic group, as described, for example, in U.S. Patent No. 5,312,940 for Grubbs et al. When any one of X1, X2, L1, L2, R1, W and Y are linked to form cyclic groups, the cyclic groups can be five- or six-membered rings, or can comprise two or three five- or six-membered rings, that can be fused or bonded. Cyclic groups can be aliphatic or aromatic, and can be containing hetero atoms and / or substituted, as explained above.
A group of exemplary catalysts covered by the structure of general formula (XIII) are those in which men are equal to zero, such that the complex has the structure of formula (XIV):

Possible and preferred ligands X1, X2 and L1 are as previously described with respect to the complexes of general formula (III), as are 5 possible and preferred halves Y <+> and Z <->. M is Ru or Os, preferably Ru and R1 is hydrogen or C1-C12 alkyl, preferably hydrogen.
In catalysts of the type of the general formula (XIV), L1 is preferably a carbene ligand containing heteroatom with the structure of formula (XV)
so that the complex (XIV) has the formula structure (XVI)
where X1, X2, R1, R2, Y and Z are as defined above, and the remaining 15 substituents are as follows: Z1 and Z2 are heteroatoms typically selected from N, O, S and P. As O and S are divalent, j is necessarily zero when Z1 is O or S, and k is necessarily zero when Z2 is O or S. However, when Z1 is N or P, then j is 1, and when Z2 is N or P, then k is 1. In a preferred embodiment, both Z1 and Z2 are N. Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 are binders, for example, C1-C12 hydrocarbilene, C1-C-12 substituted hydrocarbilene, C1-12 hydrocarbilene containing heteroatom, hydrocarbilene Substituted CrCi2 containing heteroatom, or - (CO) - ew, x, y, and z are independently zero or 1, which means that each linker is optional. Preferably, w, x, y, and z are all zero. R3, R3A, R4 and R4A and are independently selected from hydrogen, hydrogen, CrC2o hydrocarbyl, substituted C- | -C2o hydrocarbyl, C-1-C20 hydrocarbyl containing heteroatoms and CM-C20 hydrocarbyl containing substituted heteroatom. Preferably, w, x, y, and z are zero, Z1 and Z1 are N, and R3A and R4A are linked to form -Q-, so that the complex has the structure of formula (XVII):
wherein R3 and R4 are defined as above, preferably with at least one of R3 and R4, and more preferably both symbols R3 and R4, being alicyclic or aromatic from one to approximately five rings, and optionally containing one or more hetero atoms and / or substituents. Q is a linker, typically a hydrocarbilene linker, including substituted CrCi2 hydrocarbilene, CrC-12 hydrocarbilene, C-1-C12 hydrocarbilene containing heteroatom, or CrC12 hydrocarbilene linker containing substituted heteroatom, where two or more substituents on adjacent atoms within Q they can be linked to form an additional cyclic structure, which can likewise be substituted to provide a fused polycyclic structure of two to approximately five cyclic groups. Q is often, although not necessarily, a bond of two atoms or a bond of three atoms, for example, —CH2 — CH2—, - CH (Ph) —CH (Ph) -where Ph is phenyl; = CR-N =, giving rise to an unsubstituted (when R = H) or substituted (R = other than H) triazolyl group, or —CH2— SiR2 — CH2— (where R is H, alkyl, alkoxy, etc. .)
In a more preferred embodiment, Q is a bond of two atoms having the structure —CR8R9 ~ CR10R11— or —CR8 = CR10—, preferably - CR8R9 — CR10R11—, in which R8, R9, R10 and R11 are independently selected from hydrogen, C-1-C12 hydrocarbyl alkyl, substituted CrC12 hydrocarbyl, C1-C-12 hydrocarbyl containing hetero atoms, CrC12 hydrocarbyl containing substituted hetero atom, and functional groups as defined above. Examples of functional groups include carboxyl, C1-C20 alkoxy, C5-C20-aryloxy, C2-C20 alkoxycarbonyl, C2-C20 alkoxycarbonyl, C2-C20 acyloxy, C1-C20 alkylthio, C5-C2o arylthio, C1-C20 alkylsulfonyl, and C-1-C20 alkylsulfinyl optionally substituted by one or more parts selected from C-1-C10 alkyl, C1-C20 alkoxy, C5-C20 aryl, hydroxyl, sulfhydryl, formyl, and halide. Alternatively, any two of R8, R9, R10 and R11 can be linked together to form a saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted ring structure, for example, an alicyclic C4-C12 group or a C5 or C6 aryl group, which it can itself be replaced, for example, by aromatic or alicyclic groups attached or fused, or by other substituents.
Further details regarding such complexes of formula (XIII), as well as associated preparation methods, can be obtained from U.S. Patent No. 7,365,140, incorporated herein by reference for its teaching of such complexes and their preparation.
As understood in the field of catalysis, solid supports suitable for any of the catalysts described in this document can be manufactured with synthetic, semi-synthetic, or naturally occurring materials, which can be organic or inorganic, for example, polymeric, ceramic or metallic. Attachment to the support will generally, although not necessarily, be covalent and the covalent bond may be direct or indirect, if indirect, typically through a functional group on a support surface.
Non-limiting examples that can be used in the reactions of the description include the following, some of which are identified for convenience throughout this description by reference to their molecular weight:









In previous molecular structures and formulas, Ph represents a phenyl group, Cy represents cyclohexane, Me represents methyl, nBu represents n-butyl, 5 i-Pr represents isopropyl, py represents pyridine (coordinated through the N atom), and Mes represents mesityl (i.e., 2,4,6-trimethyl-phenyl).
Additional examples of catalysts useful in the reactions of the present description include the following: ruthenium (II) dichloro (3-methyl-1,2-butenylidene) bis (tricyclopentylphosphine) (C716); ruthenium (II) dichloro (3-methyl-1,2-butenylidene) 10 bis (tricyclohexylphosphine) (C801); ruthenium (II) dichloro (phenylmethylene) bis (tricyclohexylphosphine) (C823); ruthenium (II) [1,3-bis- (2,4,6-trimethylphenyl) -2-imidazolidinylidene) dichloro (phenylmethylene) (triphenylphosphine) (C830) and ruthenium (II) dichloro (vinyl phenylmethylene) from bis (tricyclohexylphosphine) ) (C835); ruthenium (II) dichloro (tricyclohexylphosphine) (o-isopropoxyphenylmethylene) (C601) and ruthenium (II) (1,3-bis- (2, 4, 6, -trimethyl-phenyl) -2-imidazolidinylidene) dichloro (phenylmethylene) ( bis 3-bromopyridine (0884)).
Exemplary ruthenium metathesis catalysts include those represented by structures 12 (generally known as Grubbs catalyst), 14 and 16. Structures 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68 , 70, 72 and 74 represent additional ruthenium-based catalysts. Catalysts C627, C682, C697, C712, C831, C915, C827 and also represent additional ruthenium-based catalysts. General structures 50 and 52 represent additional ruthenium-based catalysts of the type reported in Chemical & Engineering News, February 12, 2007, on pages 37-47. In the structures, Ph represents a phenyl group, Mes is mesityl, py is pyridine, Cp is cyclopentyl, and Cy is cyclohexyl.
Techniques for using catalysts by metathesis are known in the art (see, for example, U.S. Patent No. 7,102,047; 6,794,534; 6,696,597; 6,414,097; 6,306,988; 5,922,863; 5,750,815 and metathesis catalysts with ligands in Publication in the USA No. 2007/0004917 A1), all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. A number of catalysts per metathesis, as shown, are manufactured by Materia, Inc. (Pasadena, California).
Exemplary additional metathesis catalysts include, without limitation, metal-carbene complexes selected from the group consisting of molybdenum, osmium, chromium, rhenium, and tungsten. The term "complex" refers to a metal atom, such as a transition metal atom, with at least one coordinated or linked ligand or complexing agent. Such a ligand is typically a Lewis base in metal-carbene complexes useful for alkaline or ajenoid metathesis. Typical examples of such ligands include stabilized phosphines, halides and carbenes. Some metathesis catalysts may employ plural metals or co-catalyst metals (for example, a catalyst comprising a tungsten halide, a tetraalkyl tin compound, and an organo-aluminum compound).
An immobilized catalyst can be used for the metathesis process. An immobilized catalyst is a system that comprises a catalyst and a support, the catalyst associated with the support. Exemplary associations between the catalyst and the support can occur through chemical bonds or weak interactions (for example, hydrogen bonds, donor-acceptor interactions) between the catalyst, or any portion of it, and the support or any portion of it. The support is intended to include any material suitable for supporting the catalyst. Typically, immobilized catalysts are solid phase catalysts that act on reagents and products in liquid or gaseous phase. Exemplary supports are polymers of silica or alumina. Such an immobilized catalyst can be used in a flow process. An immobilized catalyst can simplify product purification and catalyst recovery so that recycling the catalyst can be more convenient.
As used herein, a Schrock catalyst means a catalyst as generally described in U.S. Patent No. 4,681,956 and 5,146,033, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Particularly useful as catalysts in the metathesis reaction are Schrock catalysts having the following general formula: M (NR1) (OR2) 2 (CHR3) where M is molybdenum or tungsten, and more preferably molybdenum; R1 is alkyl, aryl, or arylalkyl; R2 is alkyl, aryl, arylalkyl or its substituted halogen derivatives, a fluorinated alkyl or fluorinated aryl group is particularly preferred; and R3 is alkyl, aryl or arylalkyl. Particularly preferred are Schrock catalysts containing molybdenum. Sulphonation
Sulphonation of the internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins can be carried out by any method known to a person skilled in the art. The sulfonation reaction can typically be performed in a continuous, thin-film reactor, maintained at approximately 10 to approximately 50 ° C. The internal olefin or mixture is placed in the reactor, together with the sulfur trioxide diluted with air. The molar ratio of internal olefin to sulfur trioxide can be maintained at a suitable ratio, for example, from approximately 0.7: 1 to approximately 1.1: 1. The sulfonated derivative of internal olefins or mixture can be neutralized with alkaline sodium hydroxide, for example, to form the corresponding salt. The reaction is exothermic and the viscosity of the reaction product may depend on the amount of water present. General conditions and processes for olefin sulfonation are described in U.S. Patent No. 4,252,192, the content of which is incorporated herein. EOR process
The processes for advanced oil recovery, as well as the compositions, variable conditions of the process, the techniques and the sequences used in it are known and described in US Patents No. 5,247,993, 5,654,261, 6,022,834, 6,439 .308, 7,055,602, 7,137,447 and 7,229,950, and in Hirasaki, G .; Miller, C .; Porto, M .; Recent advances in EOR surfactant. SPE 2008 (115386), whose content is incorporated here by his teachings related to EOR techniques.
The present process for advanced oil recovery from an oil containing formation can use an advanced chemical oil recovery technique, either alone or in combination with other advanced oil recovery techniques, such as advanced injection oil recovery gas or thermal.
Flooding of surfactant polymer (SP) may involve injection into a reservoir of a fluid containing water and / or brine and from approximately 0.05 weight percent, or even less than approximately 2 weight percent or even higher of surfactant and approximately 0.05 weight percent or even less than approximately 1 weight percent or even higher polymer. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that both polymer loads and surfactants are dependent on the conditions of the reservoir and cost considerations. Flooding by Alkali Polymer Surfactant (ASP) may involve the injection of water and / or saline solution containing alkali in addition to surfactant and polymer. ASP systems can contain on the order of approximately 0.1 weight percent, or even less than approximately 1 weight percent or even higher than alkali, approximately 0.05 weight percent, or even less than approximately 2 weight percent. weight or even higher of surfactant, and approximately 0.05 weight percent or even less than approximately 1 weight percent or even higher polymer.
The present process for the advanced recovery of oil from an oil-containing formation may include introducing into said formation an aqueous composition comprising at least one sulfonated derivative of an internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins, wherein the olefin or internal mixture it is characterized by having low amounts of tri-substitution in the olefin bond. The present description can be carried out using production and injection systems, as defined by any suitable well arrangement. For purposes of illustration, an exemplary well arrangement generally used in flooding operations and suitable for use in carrying out the oil recovery processes of this description involves two wells.
The SP or ASP flood is injected into one well and oil is recovered from a second adjacent well. Of course, other arrangements can also be used in carrying out the present description. Co-surfactants
In some embodiments, co-surfactants can be used in combination with the sulfonated derivative of the internal olefin or mixture of internal olefins. Anionic, nonionic, zwitterionic, amphoteric and cationic surfactants can be used. Examples of anionic surfactants include: internal olefin sulfonates other than those described in this document, for example, internal olefin sulfonates based on internal olefins with more than approximately 6 molar percent tri-substitution on the double bond, alkoxylated alcohol sulfates, alkoxylated alcohol sulfonates, alkyl aryl sulfonates, alpha-olefin sulfonates, alkane sulfonates, alkane sulfates, alkylphenol sulfates, alkylamide sulfates, alkylamine sulfates, alkylamide ether sulfates, alkylaryl polyether sulfonates, alkylphenol sulfonates , ligninsulfonates, petroleum sulfonates, phosphate esters, alkali metals, fatty acid amine or ammonium salts referred to as soaps, fatty alcohol ether sulphates, alkyl ether carboxylates, / / - acyl - / / - alkyltaurates , arylalkane sulfonates, sulfosuccinate esters, alkyldiphenylethersulfonates, alkylpaptalenesulfonates, naptalene acid-formaldehyde condensates ulphonic, alkyl isothionates, fatty acid polypeptide condensation products, sulfonated glyceride oils, fatty acid monoethanolamide sulfates, sulfonated fatty acid esters, / V-acyl glutamates, A / -acyl glycinates, A alinates / -acyl, acylated and fluorinated anionic amino acids. Examples of nonionic surfactants include those derived from propylene oxide / ethylene oxide adducts with a molecular weight of 1000 to 15000 alkoxylated alkylphenols, alkoxylated alcohols, alkoxylated glycols, alkoxylated mercaptans, long chain carboxylic acid esters, alkanolamine condensates, alkanolamides, tertiary acetylenic glycols, alkoxylated silicones, / V-alkylpyrolidones, alkylene oxide copolymers, ethoxylated hydrocarbons, fatty amine oxides, fatty acid glycol partial esters, fatty acid alkanolamides and alkyl polyglycosides. Examples of zwitterionic and amphoteric surfactants include Cs-Cw betaines, C8-C18 sulfobetaines, C8-C24 alkylamido-C1-C4 alkylenebetaines, β-Δ / - alkylminopropionic acids, N β iminodipropionic acids, imidazoline carboxylates, imidazoline carboxylates, imidazoline, and amidoamines, amidobetaines, amine oxides and sulfobetaines.
Examples of cationic surfactants include long chain amines and corresponding salt salts, acylated polyamines, quaternary ammonium salts, imidazolium salts, alkoxylated long chain amines, quaternized long chain amines and amine oxides. Solvents
In some embodiments, solvents can be used. Examples of solvents include alcohols, ethers and amines. More specific examples of solvents are ethyl alcohol, n-propyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, iso-butyl alcohol, n-butyl alcohol, sec-butyl alcohol, n-amyl alcohol, sec-amyl alcohol, hexyl alcohol, octanol, 2-ethylexyl alcohol and the like, ethylene glycol butyl ether, lauryl alcohol ethoxylate, glycerin, poly (glycerin), ethers of polyalkylene alcohols, polyalkylene glycols, poly (oxyalkylene) glycols, ethers of poly (oxyalkylene) glycols or any other common organic solvent or combinations of any two or more solvents. Polymers
In some embodiments, polymers can be used to increase the mobilization of at least a portion of the oil through formation. Suitable polymers include, but are not limited to, polyacrylamides, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, polyacrylates, ethylene copolymers, biopolymers, carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, polystyrene, polyvinyl-pyrrolidone, 2-acrylate-2-acrylamide-sulfonate-2-acrylamide-2-acrylamide-2-acrylamide-2-acrylamide-2-acrylamide-2-acrylamide their combinations. Examples of ethylene copolymers include copolymers of acrylic acid and acrylamide, acrylic acid and lauryl acrylate, lauryl acrylate and acrylamide. Examples of biopolymers include xanthan gum and guar gum. Molecular weights (Mw) of polymers can range from approximately 10,000 daltons to approximately 20,000,000 daltons. Polymers are used in the range of approximately 500 to approximately 2500 ppm of concentration, preferably from approximately 1000 to 2000 ppm, in order to equal or exceed the oil viscosity of the reservoir under the conditions of the temperature and pressure reservoir. In some embodiments, the polymers can be cross-linked in situ to a hydrocarbon-containing formation. In other embodiments, the polymers can be generated in situ with a hydrocarbon-containing formation. Polymers and polymer preparations for use in oil recovery are described in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,427,268, 6,439,308, 5,654,261, 5,284,206, 5,199,490 and 5,103,909, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Alkali
Sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium metaborate and sodium tetraborate are non-limiting examples of alkali that can be used in the practice of the present description. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the basic salts of other metals in Group 1A and metals in Group 2A can serve as suitable counterions for the role of alkali. It will also be understood by those skilled in the art that basic organic alkaline compounds, such as, but not limited to, triethanolamine or ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, amines in general, as well as any other compounds that increase the pH and, therefore, would create in situ soaps from sodium, can serve the alkali function in the present description. In addition, any technique that neutralizes the acids present in oil can be employed.
The EOR composition of the description can be manufactured, stored and shipped in concentrated form for further dilution with water or brine, to form an injectable fluid. As a concentrate, the EOR composition can typically contain from approximately 15 to approximately 85% by weight of water, from approximately 15 to approximately 85% by weight sulfonated derived from an internal olefin, or mixture of internal olefins as described herein, and from approximately 0 to approximately 50% by weight of optional components. The above quantities are for illustrative purposes only. The amounts of water, surfactants and optional components employed can vary widely, depending on variables such as salinity, crude oil composition, temperature, formation and the like. It is well within the reach of a person skilled in the art to select appropriate amounts of each component based on the particular set of variables that can be found in a specific oil-containing formation. After dilution with water or brine, from approximately 0.01 to approximately 5, preferably from approximately 0.05 to approximately 1 by weight% of the EOR composition of the description, based on the total weight of the injectable fluid, can be introduced formation with oil content.
In some embodiments of the description, the ideal salinity can be reduced by increasing the alpha-olefin (AO) conversion of the metathesis-derived internal olefin which is subsequently sulfonated and used in a chemical EOR formulation.
A person skilled in the art will recognize that modifications can be made to the present description without departing from the spirit or scope of the description. The description is further illustrated by the following examples which are not to be construed as limiting the description or extent of the specific procedures described herein. EXAMPLES Example 1: General Metathesis Procedure A
A mixture of 1-decene (0.2 molar, NAO 10 from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), 1-dodecene (0.2 molar, NAO 12 from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company) and 1-tetradecene (0.2 molar, NAO 14 from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company) was placed in a 250 ml four-necked reaction flask equipped with a thermocouple, a magnetic stir bar, a reflux condenser, and rubber septa in the remaining nozzle. A syringe needle (18 gauge) was inserted through one of the septa and submerged in the liquid. The needle was connected to a nitrogen source and the nitrogen was gently bubbled through the liquid. The nitrogen was vented through the condenser to a bubbler filled with glycerin. The liquid was heated to temperature and was degassed for 0.5 hour at 60 ° C or 1 hour at 30 ° C (see Table 1), with a constant flow of nitrogen below the surface. Thereafter, 100 molar ppm (based on the total mol of olefins used) of metathesis catalyst (see Table 1) was added by removing the thermocouple and adding as quickly as possible under a positive pressure of nitrogen. The nitrogen flow was continued for the remainder of the reaction, and the reaction was monitored by 1HNMR spectroscopy at various times. Once the reaction reached a conversion of 97% or greater, or reacted for 24-26 hours, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered through a Purasil plug (60 Â, 230-400 mesh) in a 350 ml raw glass frying funnel. Weight was measured, the filtered sample was analyzed by 1HNMR spectroscopy, and its iodine value was determined. The final internal olefin content (provided as a molar percentage), iodine values, and calculated equivalent weights are provided in Table 1 below. Table 1. Analytical Data for Internal Olefin Products from Metathesis Procedure A.


Example A8 was produced at twice the catalyst load, as example A3. % IO = molar% of internal olefin,% aO = molar% of olefin,% VO = molar% of vinylidene, and% TO = molar% of tri-substituted olefins, all of which were measured by spectroscopy of 1HNMR. IV = iodine value in units of g of l2 / 100 g of sample. EW = equivalent weight in g / mol. The conversion percentage is defined as the% IO quotient divided by the sum of% IO and% OO, multiplied by 100. Example 2: General Metathesis Procedure B for Synthesis of Internal Olefins (IO) with Catalyst 12 Ruthenium
Standard inert atmosphere techniques were employed throughout the reaction by metathesis in order to minimize any effects of oxygen on the reaction. The desired alpha-olefin or alpha-olefin mixture (C10: 1-decene, C12: 1-dodecene, C14: 1-tetradecene, or mixtures thereof, obtained from CP Chem, The Woodlands, TX) was loaded onto a 1 liter reaction flask with four necks equipped with a thermocouple, magnetic stir bar, reflux condenser, and rubber septa in each of the remaining two necks and heated to 50 ° C. The addition of a ruthenium-based metathesis catalyst 12 (obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc; Milwaukee, Wl; Catalog No. 579726) (ca 0.0.02 - 0.25 mol%) initiated the reaction. After achieving an olefin conversion greater than 95%, as determined by 1HNMR spectroscopy, heating was discontinued and the reaction sprayed with air. Filtration through silica gel removed the spent catalyst from the resulting internal olefin. The analytical data for the products are provided in Table 2. Table 2. Analytical Data for Internal Olefin Products from Metathesis Procedure B.
C10 = 1-decene C12 = 1-dodecene C14 = 1-tetradecene, C16 = 1-hexadecene. Components of the feed composition are in equal molar concentrations. The conversion percentage is defined according to Table 1. Example 3: Metathesis C Procedure for Scale Synthesis of Internal Olefins with C831 Ruthenium Catalyst
The startup material was passed through an activated alumina column, and loaded into a 50-gallon reactor. The reactor was evacuated by means of a mechanical vacuum pump (with the release of ventilated gas through an exhaust hood) and refilled with argon or nitrogen three times. The Catalyst (0.00005 equiv.) Was added as a solid through the reactor port, under a positive pressure of nitrogen. The reactor was closed, and the solution was stirred under vacuum. After several minutes, vigorous foam started. The process was carried out in two stages. In the first stage (2-3 h), the temperature was set at 20 ° C and a total vacuum was applied. In the second stage (17-23 h), the temperature was increased to 30 ° C and the vacuum was accompanied by bubbling N2 (deflected from a bubbler) through an immersion tube. The reaction was monitored by GC at the completion of stage one, two hours at stage two and at the end point of the reaction. Monitoring was performed by closing the reactor to vacuum, filling with N2, and taking samples under a positive pressure of N2. Upon completion, the product was pumped from the reactor, filtered through silica gel, and colorless oil was collected. The analysis of the product is presented in Table 3. Table 3. Analysis of the product of the metathesis procedure C.

Components of the feed composition are in equal molar concentrations. % IO = molar% of internal olefin,% oO = molar% of olefin,% VO = molar% of vinylidene, and% TO = molar% of tri-substituted olefins, all of which were measured by spectroscopy of 1HNMR. IV = iodine value in units of g of l2 / 100 g of sample. EW = equivalent weight in g / mol. The conversion percentage is defined according to table 1. Example 4a: Sulfonation of Descending Film of the Product of Procedure C.
One gallon of the product from Procedure C was sulfonated with dry air / SO3 mixture in a 6ft, 0.5 "(ID) diameter descending film sulfonator, with a feed rate of 200 g / minute and feed temperature of 25 ° C. The SOs / air mixture was at a temperature of 40 ° C and a flow rate of 61.27 g / minute. The product came out of the tube at 44 ° C. The sulfonated acid product was then neutralized by pouring it into a pre-cooled (17 ° C) solution of 1.93 pounds of 50 wt% NaOH (aq) in 3.79 pounds of water and 1.43 pounds of Butylcellosolve® for approximately 12 minutes. An additional 330 g of acid was added to exhaust caustic excess. The temperature rose to 41.2 ° C at the end of neutralization. The neutralized solution was then heated overnight to approximately 95 ° C under a blanket of nitrogen yielding 5 quarts of a gallon of sulfonated product. Assets = 52.38% by weight. Caustic free = 0.44% by weight. Solids = 60.02% by weight. Table 5 c contains analytical data for the internal olefin sulfonates generated in this patent. 4b Example: Descending Film Sulfonation of Comparative Internal Olefins Comp IO-1, Comp IO-2A, Comp IO-2B.
The internal olefin feed was continuously sulfonated using a descending film reactor with three 1-inch ID tubes. The feed was delivered to the reactor tubes at a temperature of 25 ° C and at a rate of between 187 and 190 pounds / h divided equally between each tube. The feed was reacted simultaneously with a mixture of a gas stream of 40 ° C containing dry air at a delivery rate of 167 SCFM, and sulfur trioxide added at a rate of between 60 and 63 pounds / h. The reactor tube ring contained a cooling medium delivered at 22 ° C. The resulting acid product was added continuously to a neutralizer unit where the acid was mixed with: • 50% by weight of sodium hydroxide added at a rate of 64.8 pounds / h • water added at a rate of 28.7 pounds / h • Butylcellosolve® added at a rate of 25.0 pounds / h • a continuous flow of circulation consisting of the neutralized mixture of these materials.
These flows were mixed using a high speed mixer consisting of a rotor and a stator. The circulation flow was maintained at a temperature between 35 and 40 ° C. The product from this unit (containing a small excess of unreacted sodium hydroxide) was collected and loaded into a batch reaction vessel. After the free space was purged with nitrogen, the closed vessel was heated so that the resulting pressure in the reactor was between 18 and 20 PSIG; this occurred at a temperature between 111 and 115 ° C. The reactor was kept at temperature until the free caustic content of the mixture stabilized. This usually requires approximately eight hours, at temperature. Example 5: Metathesis D Procedure for the Synthesis of Mixtures of Internal Olefins with Catalyst C831 Ruthenium.
Representative procedure for sample preparation: a 3-neck, 11-neck round-bottom flask with magnetic stir bar was loaded with 300 g of the AO C10 / 12/14 mixture. The flask was evacuated (internal pressure at both 0.5 and 75 mm Hg) and the system was heated to 30 ° C. Catalyst C831 (2.5 - 25 molar ppm) was added as a solution in toluene (5 - 20ml) via a syringe, at which point the evolution of the gas was observed. The reaction was allowed to proceed under vacuum for 14 - 22h without being disturbed. The flask was then filled with nitrogen and the crude product was filtered through a pad of silica gel. The products were colorless liquids and were analyzed by GC and 1HNMR spectroscopy. Analytical data for each of the products are provided in Table 4. Table 4. Analytical Data for Samples Produced at Variable Levels of Internal Olefin Concentrations Using Procedure D.
aThe weight percentage of internal olefins was determined by gas chromatography and is a compound of all internal olefins present in the product. b Conversion is defined as shown in Table 1. Example 6: Sulfonation Procedure for Internal Olefins performed by General Metathesis Procedure B, C or D.
Sulfonations on a laboratory scale were performed by contacting the internal olefins prepared by process B, C or D with approximately a molar excess of 25% (based on the iodine value) of sulfur trioxide, at 35 - 40 ° C in a stirred 500 reactor . Immediately after the sulfonation step, the acid was added to a stirred solution of water, 50% by weight of NaOH (1.3 equivalent based on the acid), and Butylcellosolve® (10% by weight based on the acid) while maintaining temperature below 45 ° C. After stirring for 1 h, the contents of the flask were transferred to a 400 ml Parr® reactor and stirred for 1.5 h at 150 ° C to yield the final internal olefin sulfonate product. Tables 5 and 5a contain analytical data and descriptions of internal olefin sulfonates generated here. Quantification of Substitution in Internal Olefins
1HNMR spectroscopy was used to determine the amount of substitution on the double bond of internal olefins that are the subject of the description, as well as those of the comparative examples. The molar% of disubstituted olefins is defined as the quotient between one half of the integrated intensity of the region associated with the two protons attached to the double bond, divided by the sum of one half of the integrated intensity of the region associated with the two protons attached to the double bond and the integrated intensity of the region associated with the proton attached to the tri-substituted double bond multiplied by 100. See figures 5 and 6a-d for an explanation of spectral interpretation, as well as representative spectra. Table 6 contains a summary of the results. All 5 internal olefins derived from metathesis have less than approximately four molar percent and, typically, less than one molar percent tri-substitution. Table 6a provides descriptions of internal olefins derived from comparative isomerization. Comp IO-2A and Comp IO-2B are different batches of the same material. The amount of tri-substitution present in the internal olefins 10 derived from isomerization is at least greater than approximately six mol%. Table 5. Summary of Analytical Data on Internal Olefins Sulphonates

1 Assets determined by potentiometric titration of anionic surfactants. This method is based on ASTM D 4251-83. 2 Free caustic determined by HCI titration for neutrality and expressed in terms of% by weight of NaOH. 3Comp IO-2A is C2024 internal olefin available from Shell Chemical. It is a distinct lot of Comp IO-2B. 4Comp IO-2B is C2024 internal olefin available from Shell Chemical. It is a distinct lot of Comp IO-2A. 5Comp 10-1 is C20-24 Isomerized Alpha Olefin available from Chevron Phillips Chemical. Example 7: Experimental Procedure for Determining the Ideal Salinity (OS)
This procedure is adapted from those available in the literature. See, vitt, D. B .; Jackson, A. C .; Heinson, C .; Britton, L. N .; Malik, T .; Dwarakanath, V .; Pope, G. A., Identification and Evaluation of High Performance EOR Surfactants. SPE 2006, (100089), 1 - 11, Levitt, D. B. Experimental Evaluation of High Performance EOR Surfactants for a Dolomite Oil Reservoir. University of Texas, Austin, 2006, Zhao, P .; Jackson, A. C .; Britton, C .; Kim, D. H .; Britton, L. N .; Levitt, D. B., Development of High-Performance Surfactants for Difficult Oils. SPE 2008, (113432), the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference for his teaching of techniques for determining the ideal salinity. Solutions containing: • 2% by weight of surfactant (internal olefin sulfonate and optionally Petrostep® C-8 present at 20% by weight of the total 2% by weight of surfactant) • 4% by weight of solvent (Butylcellosolve® by Dow Chemical) • 1% by weight of an alkali (Na2CO3) (optional) was prepared in concentrations of NaCl brine ranging from 0.00 to 6.00% by weight. The formulation without the optional Petrostep® C-8 and sodium carbonate is defined here as the Single Component Formulation in Table 6, while the formulation containing both the optional Petrostep® C-8 and sodium carbonate is defined here as the Formulation Double Component. Petrostep® C-8 is the branched sodium salt of dodecylbenzene sulfonate, available commercially from Stepan Company. Known volumes of these solutions were then added to graduated glass tubes, placed in contact with an excessive amount of oil (dean, in the case of the Single Component Formulation; dodecane, in the case of the Dual Component Formulation), sealed and left to balance the 50 ° C for two weeks. The observation of the relative volumes of the resulting aqueous, organic and micro-emulsion phases allows the determination of the solubility proportions for each formulation - pair in oil at a certain concentration of brine. From these data, the person skilled in the art can determine the ideal salinity of a formulation as opposed to the tested oil. The data collected in these experiments are summarized in Table 6. Figures 1 to 4 demonstrate that formulations containing internal olefin sulfonates derived from internal olefins characterized by having low amounts of tri-substitution around the double bond present lower salinity than those containing internal olefin sulfonates derived from internal olefins with comparable median carbon numbers median and higher degrees of substitution. It is worth noting that the IOS-02, which has an average number of carbon C18 and a low degree of substitution around the double bond, provides an ideal salinity comparable or less than that of materials with higher degrees of substitution, but the numbers of larger median carbon. This is unexpected, since a higher carbon number should produce a more hydrophobic surfactant and therefore less ideal salinity. Also notable is the fact that IOS-01, with a degree of substitution of approximately four molar percent, has a lower ideal salinity than IO-based formulations derived from IO having a slightly higher degree of substitution of approximately six molar percent . The data presented in Figures 1 to 4 and Table 6, both in magnitude and in effect, is surprising and unexpected. Table 5a. IOS 1IOS descriptions: example of description 2C-IOS: comparative example 3Sulfonated according to the procedure of example 6 4Sulfonated according to the procedure of example 4a 5Sulfonated according to the procedure of example 4b Example 8: The Effect of Conversion of IO into Ideal Salinity (OS)
Internal olefin sulphonates (IOS) prepared using the method described in Example 6 with the internal olefins (IO), described in Table 4, were evaluated in formulations as opposed to dean and dodecane according to the procedure described in Example 9, to determine the effect of the conversion of 5 alpha-olefin on performance (Figures 11 and 12). Both formulations showed an ideal salinity reduction with an increase in the conversion of alpha-olefin (AO). A possible explanation for this behavior is that the AO remaining in the IO product is sulfonated together with the IO and decreases the hydrophobicity of the surfactant formulation, due to its lower number of carbon and low molecular weight.
Table 6. Summary of Ideal Salinity and Internal Olefin Compositions


Table 6a Summary of Internal Olefins Derived from Comparative Isomerization.
Example 9: Measurement of Interfacial Tension (IFT) and Determination of Ideal Salinity (OS) through Spinning Drop Tensiometry and Observations of Phase Tube in Opposition to Crude Oil
Table 7. Summary of 5 Phase 1 Behavior Experiment Formulations
1All formulations contained 1.0% by weight of Na2CO3. Petrostep® S-2 is an internal olefin sulfonate C1518, sodium salt. Petrostep® A-6 is an alkylaryl sulfonate, sodium salt. Petrostep® C8 is a branched alkylaryl sulfonate, sodium salt. All Petrostep® products are available from Stepan. Neodol® 25-12 is a 12-C1215 molar ethoxylate available from Shell Chemical. EGBE stands for ethylene glycol butyleter.
Test surfactant mixtures were made, as shown in Table 7. Table 10 contains a list of the crude oils used, as well as characterization data. The number in the formulation in Table 7 corresponds to the number 15 of the oil listed in Table 10, with which the formulation was used. Whenever possible, phase tube observations were used to determine the ideal salinity and IFT according to methods described in the references cited in Example 7. In cases where the oil opacity in IFT's obscure phase behavior was measured between the solution of surfactant and the interface 20 oil at different salinities using a spinning drop tensiometer. The results of these experiments are shown in Figure 7. The lowest IFT values occur at the ideal salinity of the system, and both low ideal salinity and interfacial tension are desirable. The data shown in Figure 7, demonstrate that internal olefin sulfonates derived from internal olefins with a low degree of tri-substitution on the double bond have low IFT (ie less than 1 x 10'2 mN / m), salinity ideal as opposed to current crude oils and therefore have utility in EOR formulations. Example 10: ASP Flooded Core Experimental Procedure
The flooded core procedures described below are well known to those skilled in the art and are based on techniques found in the literature (Levitt, DB (2006). Experimental Evaluation of High Performance EOR Surfactants for a Dolomite Oil Reservoir. Petroleum Engineering. Austin, University of Texas, Master of Engineering: 160). The core was prepared as follows. A known mass of quartz sand having particle sizes between 100 and 200 mesh was packaged in an aluminum tube 11.4 "in length, 1.5" ID (2 "OD) between two stainless steel mesh screens. 200 mesh The core apparatus was weighed and fixed vertically so that all liquids that could be injected from the top The core was then saturated with degassed synthetic brine (22,615 ppm total dissolved solids (TDS), see Table 8 for composition), at a flow rate of 2 ml / minute. The mass of the brine needed to saturate the core was used to calculate the pore volume (PV) of the core. The brine permeability of the core was calculated from the pressure in the steady state across the core under a constant brine flow rate The effluent from subsequent steps was collected using a fraction collector and the collected fractions were analyzed to determine the relative amounts of water and oil, as well as as the concentration of surfactant where appropriate. The core was subsequently flooded with filtered oil 1 at a rate of 1 ml / minute, until the amount of water in the collected fractions became insignificant (ie, <approximately 0.5% by weight). A mass balance was performed at this point and the results used to calculate the initial water saturation (SWi) after the saturation of the oil and the original oil in place (OOIP). OOIP is calculated from (Swi OOIP = PV x (1-Swi)). The flood water portion of the flooded core started at the time of the introduction of synthetic brine produced to the core at a speed of 2 ft / day. The eluted fractions were collected and analyzed for oil and water composition until the amount of oil became insignificant (ie, approximately <0.5.% By weight). The total amount of oil displaced by the water was used to determine the saturation of the residual oil after flooding with water (Sor).
The ASP flood portion of the flood core started with the introduction of 0.3 PV of a surfactant solution based on Formulation 1 described in Table 7, at a total surfactant concentration of 0.5% by weight in a solution of 1 wt% Na2CO3, and 2000 ppm in HPAM 3630S at 22,615 ppm TDS water produced smoothed to the core at a speed of 2 10 ft / day. This was followed by 2-3 PV of a 2000 ppm solution in HPAM 3630S 11,308 ppm TDS of water produced with an injection rate of 2 ft / day. The injection of polymer solution continued until the amount of oil in the effluent fractions became insignificant (i.e., <approximately 0.5% by weight).
Table 8. Synthetic brine produced used in the Oil Flood Core Experiment 1

The information and results for the flood core experiment are shown in Table 9. The saturation of waste water after the oil saturation step is 0.037 for the IOS-6B test formulation. Table 9. Information for the Core Flood Experiment for IOS-6B

1Swi is calculated from the percentage by weight of water that remains in the core after oil saturation (for example, 0.036 means 3.6% by weight of brine remains after the oil flood). 2Sor is calculated from the percentage through petroleum oil that remains in the core after saturation in water (for example, 0.52 means that 52% by weight of oil remains after flooding with water). 3 Surfactant retention is calculated by determining the amount of surfactant present in the fraction eluted by potentiometric titration (method based on the ASTM D 4251-83 standard) and subtracting this amount from the total amount of surfactant in contact with the core. Table 10. Characterization of Crude Oils

At the end of the water flood phase, the residual oil is 0.51. Figure 8 shows OOIP oil recovery. The first 2.2 PV is attributed to water flooding, and the remainder to ASP and polymer flooding. OOIP recovery is 47%. However, ASP and polymer floods with a solution based on Formulation 1 recovered an additional 50% OOIP. The recovery of residual oil petroleum (Sor) in the ASP step is shown in Figure 9. The solution based on Formulation 1 recovered 93% by weight of residual oil in the ASP portion of the flood. The concentration of surfactant in the effluent is shown in Figure 10. Surfactant retentions are low (ie 0.142 mg / g of rock).
Based on phase behavior tests and spinning drop tensiometry, formulations containing IOS 06B surfactant from the instant description consistently showed both low values of interfacial tension at ideal salinities as opposed to heavy oils. A formulation based on IOS 06B surfactant from the instant description also recovered a significant amount of residual oil (ie 93%) in the ASP portion of a 5 core flood test. The data presented in Figures 8, 9 and 10 demonstrate the usefulness of the surfactants of the description in EOR applications.

权利要求:
Claims (16)
[0001]
1. A process comprising recovering oil from an oil-containing formation, said process comprising introducing said formation using flooding by surfactant polymer or flooding by alkali surfactant polymer of an aqueous composition comprising at least one surfactant comprising a sulfonated derivative of one or more internal olefins, said sulfonated derivative being obtained by sulfonation of a composition comprising internal olefins of the formula:
[0002]
2. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that one or more alpha-olefins are obtained by the metathesis of a composition containing ethylene unsaturated glyceride and / or one or more lower alpha-olefins in the presence of a catalyst metathesis.
[0003]
3. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that the alpha-olefins correspond to the formula:
[0004]
4. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that metathesis catalysts are selected from the group consisting of Grubbs-type catalysts, Schrock catalysts, Hoveyda catalysts, tungsten catalysts, molybdenum catalysts and catalysts rhenium.
[0005]
5. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that metathesis catalysts are of the formula:
[0006]
6. Process according to claim 1, characterized in that at least approximately 97 molar percent of R1 and R3 are saturated hydrocarbyl groups of straight or branched chain and at least approximately 97 molar percent of R2 and R4 are hydrogen.
[0007]
7. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that at least approximately 98 molar percent of R1 and R3 are saturated straight or branched chain hydrocarbyl groups and at least approximately 98 molar percent of R2 and R4 are hydrogen.
[0008]
8. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that at least approximately 99 molar percent of R1 and R3 are saturated straight or branched chain hydrocarbyl groups and at least approximately 99 molar percent of R2 and R4 are hydrogen.
[0009]
9. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that each of R1 and R3 contains less than approximately six molar percent of alkyl branches.
[0010]
10. Process according to claim 3, characterized by the fact that R5 contains less than approximately six molar percent of alkyl branches.
[0011]
11. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that the aqueous composition comprises at least one among co-surfactant, solvent, polymer or alkali.
[0012]
12. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that oil is a waxy crude oil.
[0013]
13. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that the composition containing unsaturated glyceride comprises a natural oil.
[0014]
14. Process according to claim 13, characterized by the fact that natural oil is selected from the group consisting of canola oil, rapeseed oil, coconut oil, corn oil, cottonseed oil, oil olive oil, palm oil, peanut oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, soybean oil, sunflower oil, linseed oil, palm kernel oil, tung oil, castor oil and combinations thereof.
[0015]
15. Process according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that one or more alpha-olefins are produced by co-metathesis of a composition containing unsaturated glyceride and ethylene.
[0016]
16. A process comprising recovering petroleum from an oil-containing formation, said process comprising introducing said formation using flooding by surfactant polymer or flooding by alkali surfactant polymer of an aqueous composition comprising at least one surfactant comprising a sulfonated derivative of one or more internal olefins, wherein said one or more internal olefins are obtained by metathesis of one or more alpha-olefins in the presence of a metathesis catalyst comprising a group 8 transition metal complex; wherein the internal olefins are obtained by metathesis of one or more alpha-olefins in the presence of a metathesis catalyst; wherein one or more alpha-olefins are obtained by metathesis of a composition containing unsaturated glyceride in the presence of a metathesis catalyst; characterized by the fact that said flooding by surfactant polymer 5 involves injecting into the oil-containing formation a fluid containing water, brine or a mixture thereof, approximately 0.05 to approximately 2% by weight of a surfactant and approximately 0.05 to approximately 1% by weight of a polymer; and wherein said flooding by alkali surfactant polymer involves injecting into the oil-containing formation a fluid containing water, brine or a mixture thereof, approximately 0.1 to approximately 1% by weight of alkali, approximately 0.05 to approximately 2% by weight of a surfactant, and approximately 0.05 to approximately 1% by weight of a polymer.

类似技术:

---

公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题

---

BR112012029589B1|2021-01-19|process for oil recovery from a formation containing oil

---

AU2010245265B2|2014-07-31|Sulfonated internal olefin surfactant for enhanced oil recovery

---

US10435618B2|2019-10-08|Surfactants for enhanced oil recovery

---

US9284481B2|2016-03-15|Method and composition for enhanced oil recovery

---

CA2833922C|2020-01-07|Large hydrophobe surfactants

---

EA018718B1|2013-10-30|Method for enhancing oil recovery with an improved oil recovery surfactant

---

CA2790913A1|2011-09-15|Use of surfactant mixtures of polycarboxylates for microemulsion flooding

---

EP2225343A1|2010-09-08|Improved enhanced oil recovery surfactant formulation and method of making the same

---

EP2109649A1|2009-10-21|Method and composition for enhanced hydrocarbons recovery

---

EA021454B1|2015-06-30|Method and composition for enhanced hydrocarbon recovery from a formation containing a crude oil with specific solubility groups and chemical families

---

Esfandiarian et al.2020|Mechanistic Investigation of LSW/Surfactant/Alkali Synergism for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fluid–Fluid Interactions

---

EP3162872A1|2017-05-03|Internal olefin sulfonate composition and use thereof in enhanced oil recovery

---

US20170183559A1|2017-06-29|Method for predicting the optimal salinity of internal olefin sulfonate compositions

同族专利:

---

公开号 | 公开日

---

CN103025996B|2016-02-03|

---

AP2012006610A0|2012-12-31|

---

EP2576975A1|2013-04-10|

---

MX2012013608A|2013-02-01|

---

ZA201208730B|2013-07-31|

---

BR112012029589A2|2017-07-18|

---

EA201291183A1|2013-05-30|

---

AU2011258575B2|2015-03-26|

---

CN103025996A|2013-04-03|

---

CA2800171C|2018-02-20|

---

EP2576975A4|2013-12-04|

---

US8889600B2|2014-11-18|

---

EA023415B1|2016-06-30|

---

WO2011149789A1|2011-12-01|

---

AU2011258575A1|2012-12-13|

---

US20130079261A1|2013-03-28|

---

MX355604B|2018-04-24|

---

CA2800171A1|2011-12-01|

---

CO6660478A2|2013-04-30|

引用文献:

---

公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题

---

---

US3647906A|1970-05-11|1972-03-07|Shell Oil Co|Alpha-olefin production|

---

US4252192A|1979-07-02|1981-02-24|Stepan Chemical Company|Process for enhanced oil recovery employing petroleum sulfonates|

---

JPH0157235B2|1982-01-28|1989-12-05|Lion Corp|

---

US4556108A|1982-01-28|1985-12-03|Lion Corporation|Micellar slug for oil recovery|

---

US4597879A|1982-01-28|1986-07-01|Lion Corporation|Micellar slug for oil recovery|

---

JPH0135157B2|1982-07-19|1989-07-24|Lion Corp|

---

JPH0257598B2|1982-08-10|1990-12-05|Lion Corp|

---

GB2135713B|1983-02-23|1986-10-22|Lion Corp|Micellar slug for oil recovery|

---

JPH0331874B2|1983-04-04|1991-05-08|Lion Corp|

---

US4545941A|1983-06-20|1985-10-08|A. E. Staley Manufacturing Company|Co-metathesis of triglycerides and ethylene|

---

US5284606A|1984-06-14|1994-02-08|Brotz Gregory R|Sphere production process at zero gravity|

---

JPS61136577A|1984-12-06|1986-06-24|Lion Corp|Fluid for petroleum recovery|

---

JPS61225490A|1985-03-28|1986-10-07|Lion Corp|Fluid for recovery of petroleium|

---

US4681956A|1985-09-25|1987-07-21|Massachusetts Institute Of Technology|Catalyst composition for effecting metathesis of olefins|

---

US4727203A|1987-04-13|1988-02-23|Shell Oil Company|Terminal to interior double bond isomerization process for an olefinic molecule with reduced dimerization|

---

US4895997A|1988-08-31|1990-01-23|Shell Oil Company|Olefin isomerization process|

---

US5146033A|1990-01-04|1992-09-08|Massachusetts Institute Of Technology|Homogeneous rhenium catalysts for metathesis of olefins|

---

US5103909A|1991-02-19|1992-04-14|Shell Oil Company|Profile control in enhanced oil recovery|

---

US5199490A|1991-11-18|1993-04-06|Texaco Inc.|Formation treating|

---

EP0773948A4|1992-04-03|1998-09-02|California Inst Of Techn|High activity ruthenium or osmium metal carbene complexes for olefin metathesis reactions and synthesis thereof|

---

US5312940A|1992-04-03|1994-05-17|California Institute Of Technology|Ruthenium and osmium metal carbene complexes for olefin metathesis polymerization|

---

US5710298A|1992-04-03|1998-01-20|California Institute Of Technology|Method of preparing ruthenium and osmium carbene complexes|

---

US5247993A|1992-06-16|1993-09-28|Union Oil Company Of California|Enhanced imbibition oil recovery process|

---

US5488148A|1993-09-01|1996-01-30|Vista Chemical Company|Process for sulfonating internal olefins|

---

US5559263A|1994-11-16|1996-09-24|Tiorco, Inc.|Aluminum citrate preparations and methods|

---

US5728785A|1995-07-07|1998-03-17|California Institute Of Technology|Romp polymerization in the presence of peroxide crosslinking agents to form high-density crosslinked polymers|

---

US5831108A|1995-08-03|1998-11-03|California Institute Of Technology|High metathesis activity ruthenium and osmium metal carbene complexes|

---

EP0787706B1|1996-01-30|2000-11-22|BP Amoco Corporation|Olefin isomerization process|

---

US6022834A|1996-05-24|2000-02-08|Oil Chem Technologies, Inc.|Alkaline surfactant polymer flooding composition and process|

---

JP2001503389A|1996-11-13|2001-03-13|シェブロンケミカルカンパニーエルエルシー|Olefin isomerization method|

---

WO1999051854A1|1998-04-06|1999-10-14|Da Qing Petroleum Administration Bureau|A foam drive method|

---

US6696597B2|1998-09-01|2004-02-24|Tilliechem, Inc.|Metathesis syntheses of pheromones or their components|

---

EP1248764B1|1999-01-26|2012-08-01|California Institute Of Technology|Novel method for cross-metathesis of terminal olefins|

---

US6427268B1|2000-01-28|2002-08-06|Dayle M. Davis|Unitary pillow sham|

---

CA2413852C|2000-06-23|2012-06-05|California Institute Of Technology|Synthesis of functionalized and unfunctionalized olefins via cross and ring-closing metathesis|

---

US6777584B2|2002-02-22|2004-08-17|Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company|Selective coupling of terminal olefins with ethylene to manufacture linear α-olefins|

---

US20030224945A1|2002-05-29|2003-12-04|Twu Fred Chun-Chien|Process for well fluids base oil via metathesis of alpha-olefins|

---

US7055602B2|2003-03-11|2006-06-06|Shell Oil Company|Method and composition for enhanced hydrocarbons recovery|

---

KR101291468B1|2004-06-09|2013-07-30|유티아이 리미티드 파트너쉽|Transition metal carbene complexes containing a cationic substituent as catalysts of olefin metathesis reactions|

---

US7312331B2|2005-06-17|2007-12-25|The Regents Of The University Of California|Stable cyclic carbenes as ligands for transition metal catalysts|

---

WO2007027955A2|2005-08-29|2007-03-08|Brazen Biofuels Inc|Fuel composition|

---

US20070225536A1|2006-03-23|2007-09-27|Eugene Frederick Lutz|Olefin conversion process and olefin recovery process|

---

US8501973B2|2006-10-13|2013-08-06|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Synthesis of terminal alkenes from internal alkenes via olefin metathesis|

---

WO2008079852A1|2006-12-21|2008-07-03|Shell Oil Company|Method and composition for enhanced hydrocarbons recovery|

---

US20080171672A1|2006-12-21|2008-07-17|Cano Manuel Luis|Method and composition for enhanced hydrocarbons recovery|

---

CA2702610C|2007-10-30|2017-01-17|Chevron Oronite Company Llc|Improved enhanced oil recovery surfactant formulation and method of making the same|

---

CN102803433A|2009-05-05|2012-11-28|斯特潘公司|Sulfonated internal olefin surfactant for enhanced oil recovery|US9051519B2|2009-10-12|2015-06-09|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Diene-selective hydrogenation of metathesis derived olefins and unsaturated esters|

---

US9000246B2|2009-10-12|2015-04-07|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Methods of refining and producing dibasic esters and acids from natural oil feedstocks|

---

US9222056B2|2009-10-12|2015-12-29|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Methods of refining natural oils, and methods of producing fuel compositions|

---

US8957268B2|2009-10-12|2015-02-17|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Methods of refining natural oil feedstocks|

---

US9382502B2|2009-10-12|2016-07-05|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Methods of refining and producing isomerized fatty acid esters and fatty acids from natural oil feedstocks|

---

US9169447B2|2009-10-12|2015-10-27|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Methods of refining natural oils, and methods of producing fuel compositions|

---

US9365487B2|2009-10-12|2016-06-14|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Methods of refining and producing dibasic esters and acids from natural oil feedstocks|

---

US8735640B2|2009-10-12|2014-05-27|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Methods of refining and producing fuel and specialty chemicals from natural oil feedstocks|

---

US9388098B2|2012-10-09|2016-07-12|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Methods of making high-weight esters, acids, and derivatives thereof|

---

US9175231B2|2009-10-12|2015-11-03|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Methods of refining natural oils and methods of producing fuel compositions|

---

US8846587B2|2011-03-24|2014-09-30|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Functionalized monomers and polymers|

---

US9315748B2|2011-04-07|2016-04-19|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Cold flow additives|

---

US9012385B2|2012-02-29|2015-04-21|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Terpene derived compounds|

---

US9108906B2|2012-03-22|2015-08-18|Uop Llc|Production of alkane sulfonates|

---

US20140274832A1|2013-03-12|2014-09-18|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Maleinized ester derivatives|

---

US20150057204A1|2013-03-12|2015-02-26|Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.|Maleanized Ester Derivatives|

---

CN103657517B|2013-10-10|2015-08-05|李火莲|Organic silicon-copper emulsifier|

---

WO2016100103A1|2014-12-15|2016-06-23|Shell Oil Company|Process and composition for alkaline surfactant polymer flooding|

---

EP3280779A1|2015-04-09|2018-02-14|Saudi Arabian Oil Company|Encapsulated nanocompositions for increasing hydrocarbon recovery|

---

WO2016177842A1|2015-05-07|2016-11-10|Rhodia Operations|Process for the decarboxylative ketonization of fatty acids or fatty acid derivatives|

---

US10125307B2|2016-01-13|2018-11-13|Saudi Arabian Oil Company|Stabilization of petroleum surfactants for enhancing oil recovery|

---

US11267781B2|2016-11-08|2022-03-08|Rhodia Operations|Method for making end compounds from internal ketones issued from the decarboxylative ketonization of fatty acids or fatty acid derivatives|

---

US11001747B2|2017-10-06|2021-05-11|Dow Global Technologies Llc|Alkanolamine and glycol ether composition for enhanced extraction of bitumen|

---

US10858576B2|2018-03-19|2020-12-08|Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc|Selection of optimal surfactant blends for waterflood enhancement|

---

WO2021087293A1|2019-10-31|2021-05-06|Chevron Oronite Company Llc|Olefin sulfonates|

---

WO2021087339A1|2019-10-31|2021-05-06|Chevron U.S.A. Inc.|Olefin sulfonates|

---

WO2021087328A1|2019-10-31|2021-05-06|Chevron U.S.A. Inc.|Olefin sulfonates|

---

CN113403056A|2021-05-27|2021-09-17|长江大学|Catalyst composition and preparation method and application thereof|

---

CN113292977A|2021-05-27|2021-08-24|长江大学|Thickened oil viscosity reducer and application thereof|

---

CN113403059A|2021-05-27|2021-09-17|长江大学|Combined catalytic viscosity reducer and application thereof|

---

CN113355075A|2021-05-27|2021-09-07|长江大学|Thickened oil viscosity reducer and preparation method and application thereof|

---

CN113292980A|2021-05-27|2021-08-24|长江大学|Water-soluble thickened oil viscosity reducer and preparation method and application thereof|

法律状态:
2018-12-26| B06F| Objections, documents and/or translations needed after an examination request according [chapter 6.6 patent gazette]|

---

2019-07-02| B06T| Formal requirements before examination [chapter 6.20 patent gazette]|

---

2019-11-26| B06A| Patent application procedure suspended [chapter 6.1 patent gazette]|

---

2020-11-10| B09A| Decision: intention to grant [chapter 9.1 patent gazette]|

---

2021-01-19| B16A| Patent or certificate of addition of invention granted [chapter 16.1 patent gazette]|Free format text: PRAZO DE VALIDADE: 20 (VINTE) ANOS CONTADOS A PARTIR DE 20/05/2011, OBSERVADAS AS CONDICOES LEGAIS. |

优先权:

---

申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题

---

US39605410P| true| 2010-05-22|2010-05-22|

---

US61/396,054|2010-05-22|

---

PCT/US2011/037433|WO2011149789A1|2010-05-22|2011-05-20|Sulfonated internal olefin surfactant for enhanced oil recovery|

---